Home WebMail Thursday, October 31, 2024, 06:37 PM | Calgary | -1.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

John 'wasn't a starved baby' says medical examiner at trial for parents of dead boy

After calling 15 witnesses, the prosecution has closed its case against two Calgary parents accused of refusing to take their dying baby to a doctor. WARNING: This story contains disturbing and graphic details

WARNING: This story contains disturbing and graphic details

Jennifer and Jeromie Clark brought their 14-month-old son John to the hospital in November 2013 but he died 21 hours later. They are on trial for criminal negligence causing death. (Sharon Sergant)

After calling 15 witnesses, the prosecution has closed its case against two Calgary parents accused of refusing to take their dying baby to a doctor. It's not yet known if Jennifer andJeromieClark will testify in their own defence.

Jennifer, 41, andJeromie, 38, are each charged withcriminal negligence causing death and failing to provide the necessaries of life. Their 14-month-oldsonJohndied of malnutrition and a staph infection in 2013.

The Crown's final witness, medical examiner Dr. Elizabeth Brooks-Lim,was cross-examined Thursday, telling jurors John"wasn't a starved baby, he wasn't a beaten child."

Brooks-Lim earliertestified John had a rare rash caused by nutritional deficiency and he ultimately died ofmalnutrition and sepsis.

The Clarks brought Johnto a Calgary hospital on the afternoon of Nov. 28, 2013.

John was "on death's doorstep" by the time his parents brought him to a doctor, according to Crown prosecutor Shane Parker.

The baby had a severe, blistering rash over 70 per cent of his body and was in septic shock at the time, according to doctors who treated the boy. Several of the baby's toes were black with gangrene, which a doctor previously testified would have taken at least a week to happen.

John died less than 24 hours laterof what was later determined to be a staph infection.

The couple's defence lawyers, David Chow and John Phillips, have suggested the boy could have died after contracting an infection at the hospital or if doctors increasedJohn's saline levels too quickly. Brooks-Lim agreed rapid correction of sodium levels could cause death.

The medical examiner also opened the door to the possibility one of John's parents could have suffered from a rare genetic disorder that may have predisposed the baby to malnutrition.

Google searches for natural remedies

Earlier in the week, jurors heard from a Calgary police forensic digital examiner who found several searches on the Clark family's computer seeking information on gangrene and potential treatments.

More than two weeks before John was taken to hospital, searches were done on the family's laptop aboutpoor circulation in the feet and eczema.

John's parents told doctors he had eczema but adermatologist testified the boy's rash was likely due to a nutritional deficiency. Police found nutrition-related searches on the Clark's computer from the months prior to his death.

Earlier in the trial, jurors also heard evidence that John's brain was about half the size it should have been for a child his age and that he had missed major developmental milestones he wasn't able to crawl or pull himself up yet.

Searches included: "can ginger help eczema;" "gangrene cayenne as a treatment;" "natural cure for wet gangrene;" and "can cabbage leaves help gangrene."

Some of the searches were done on Nov. 27 and 28, though police couldn't determine when others were done.

Jurors will return Monday when the defence will decide whether to call any witnesses.

Clarifications

  • A previous version of this story stated baby John died on Feb. 29, 2013. The date of his death has been corrected to Nov. 29, 2013.
    Oct 03, 2018 6:30 AM MT