Quebec government adopts controversial religious symbols bill

Quebec's majoritygovernment has pushed through a controversial piece of legislation thatwill bar public-school teachers, government lawyers, judges and police officers from wearing religious symbols while at work.

The bill, introduced by theCoalition Avenir Qubecgovernment, passed after a marathon weekend of deliberations at Quebec's National Assembly, in which the CAQused a parliamentary mechanism called closure to speed through the passing of its two flagship law projects: an immigration reform and the secularism bill.

The religious symbols ban, also knownas Bill 21, passed with a vote of 73-35 at around 10:30 p.m. ET Sunday.

Closureshuts down the usual committee debate over a bill, and forces a vote after around 12hours of additional discussion on the floor of the legislature.

It is the same mechanism the CAQ government used Saturday to force passage of a bill that aims to reduce delays in Quebec's immigration system by tossing out more than 16,000 pending applications for skilled worker status.

That bill, Bill 9, passed just after 4 a.m. EST Sunday, by a vote of 62-42.

The larger number of votes for Bill 21 than Bill 9 is due tosupport from theParti Qubcoisfor the religious symbols bill.

The religious symbols billhas attracted widespread criticism from legal experts and minority groups, who worry it will institutionalize discrimination. They say Muslim women who wear the hijab will be disproportionately affected.

The bill also invokes the notwithstanding clause in an effort to spare it from court challenges about its constitutionality. Protests against the impending law are already being planned in Montreal forMonday.

Surveillance and enforcement measures

The government also added a number of last-minute amendments to the bill, including changes that would allow for surveillance and enforcement of the law.

Liberal member Marc Tanguay, who voted against the bill, said the changes would result in a "secularism police.''

Immigration Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette has defended the legislation, which he sponsored, as a chance to safeguard Quebec's secular society.

Jolin-Barrette and Quebec PremierFranois Legaulthave argued that, according to polls, a majority of Quebecerswant religious symbols to be prohibited on civil servants.

"I feel like saying finally. Finally, Quebecers have been heard and listened to. Finally, a government that had the courage to act," Jolin-Barrette said Sunday evening, shortly before the vote.

The two largest opposition parties, the Liberals and Qubec Solidaire, spent the day railing against the bill, saying it goes against people's fundamental rights.

Sol Zanetti, an MNA for Qubec Solidaire, referenced other polls, with differently worded questions, that showed fewer Quebecers supported such a bill if it impinged people's rights.

"Calling on a majority suffices for several things. It suffices for a public transit project. It suffices to enact public policies, but it does not suffice to go and break human rights," Zanetti said.

He said what Jolin-Barrette added to the bill "in fact, open the door to everything" regardinghow the law will be enforced.

"Tonight, at the end of this closure, we understood, finally, why it was invoked," said Sol Zanetti, the secularism critic forQubec Solidaire, referring to the amendments.

"Because amendments were introduced to use, one after the other, in bursts, and which are enormously worrying."

'Profoundly unjust'

"In no way does [state] secularism mean the banning of religious symbols," said Liberal secularism criticHlne David.

"The minister is making the wrong choice. It's wrong because it is profoundly unjust. It will prevent employment access to women and men who are qualified. Unjust because some women will have to make a choice between a promotion, their career and a profound and sincere conviction," David said before Sunday's vote.

Speaking to reporters after the vote, David called it a "very sad day and night for Quebec."

"Tomorrow morning, a number of Quebecers will wake up with fewer rights than they had today," she said.