Understanding recession without saying the R-word: Don Pittis

"It is what it is."That bit of popular wisdomcontains so little informationthat thetongue-in-cheekrhetoricalresponse must always be, "Truer words were never spoken."

But as so many analyststryto redefine yesterday's Statistics Canada datato say Canada is notin recession after all, that truism may finally be useful.

The fact that a recession isdefined that way in Harper government legislation is not enough to convince many.

• Recession confirmed as Canada's GDP shrank in 2nd quarter
• Almost 1,000 energy sector jobs disappearing as major players announce layoffs

One of the most innovative ways to explain away the statistical evidencethat Canada's economy has been shrinking was offered by Royal Bank economist Craig Wright.

Not my recession

"If somebody's lost their job, it definitely is a recession for them," Wrighttold Piya Chattopadhyay on CBC Radio'sThe Currentminutes after Statistics Canadareleased the numbers.Wright said thatfor most Canadians, a strong job market means the rest of us are not in a recession at all.

It's good to know that by Wright's definition, I am personallynot in recession. I was at a party this week where people were talking about buying boats for their cottages. It did not sound like they were in recession either.

Sorry about you unemployed people and everything, but I'm all right, Jack.

• Recession fears all too real for Canadians struggling to cope

It is unfair to single out Wright. Establishment economists all pitched in.At BMO, economist Doug Porter declared the real R-word was "rebound."

Business is gloom-averse

The business aversion to the term recession does not mean they are all Stephen Harper partisans. Businessesfear that when customers hear the word, they may spend less. They might decide not to take out a bank loan or a mortgage.

So perhaps rather than arguing oversuch an apparentlyloaded term, we should switch to "Two SuccessiveQuarters Where The Economy Shrank." It may be awkward but at least thenwe canlook at the detail in the latest Statistics Canada report and see what we can learn.

The biggest line item to hit the eye was a 33 per cent collapsein mineral exploration. That fits with the crash in oil and commodity prices.

Yesterday's announcement of another 900 layoffs in the oil sector indicatewe should not expecta rebound there when we see the results forJuly, August andSeptember.If you live in an oil-producing region, your personal recession (whoops) may be just beginning.

"Capital formation" refers towhat businesses are spending now on plant, equipment and buildings. Itis a good predictor of future economic activity because businesses use that capital to expand jobs, output and exports. Unfortunately, that number was down twoper cent.

Loonie effect

That declinemay be due to the oil sector contraction, but another likely cause is the weak Canadian dollar that means imported equipment is 25% more expensive thanwhen the loonie was at par with the U.S. dollar.

Unfortunately, quarterly GDPdata is not broken down by region or province, so it is hard to separate out theoil industryeffect. Statistics Canada'sregional breakdownonly comes out once a year in November, and that will be for 2014. Friday'sjobless numbers will help fill thatgap.

Another loonie-related figure that seems positive at first is the increase in consumer spending, up 0.6 percent in the quarter. Perhaps that's because those of uswho aren't in recession are out buying boats.

But for others forced to spend most of what they earn, another explanation is that the falling loonie is raising the cost of goods they can't do without.

It appears that money may be coming out of household savings, which fell from 5.2 per cent to 4 per cent.

The rising cost of foreign goods is alsothe likely reason for falling imports, down 0.4 per cent, and rising exports, up 0.1 per cent. That may not be good for our trade partners, but it means we are spending more at home, probably on services that are still pricedin Canadian dollars. Services spending was up 0.8 per cent.

There was one potentiallypositive sign that seems negative at first. Businesses are adding less toinventories, down from 12 per cent to 7 per cent. Presumably once the recessionary feeling has passed, they will have to restock.

An ill wind

Another positive maynot make you feel so good. Valuecreated byreal estate agents andbrokers rose about 10 per cent. Nice to see someone profiting from all those unaffordable homes. Only a very ill wind blows nobody good.

Despite all the optimism, there is no certaintythat the data in this report tells us what will happen next. June seemed better, but as the financial companies are forced to say, past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

After this equivocal data release, that could be either good or bad. As one of those who is not personally in recession,according to Wright, I plan to keep on spending in the hope of bringing the rest of you out of your personal recessions.

I hope Porter is right about the rebound, but even he can't tell you the answers to the important questions: "Will I be happy?" and "Will I be rich?"

"The future's not ours to see," Doris Day sang in her hit song.

Somehow "It is what it is" seems so much morephilosophical when you addthe future tense and the Spanishtag Que Sera, Sera.Take it away, Doris.

Follow Don on Twitter @don_pittis

More analysisby Don Pittis