Trudeau's G20 commitment to equality needs more than fine words: Don Pittis

In a famous quote that he may or may not have actually said, U.S. presidentFranklin Delano Roosevelt reportedly told a group of supporters:"I agree with you.I want to do it, now make me do it."

True or not, the quote is used by Yale political scientist Jacob Hacker to illustrate a point about government that few people understand. While G20 leaders, includingJustin Trudeau, may have renewed their commitment to greater equality this week, even for the world's mostpowerful leaders, saying something, and even wanting it, doesn't mean it'sgoing to happen.

• G20 wraps with world leaders agreeing to use trade to boost global economy
• Trudeau says protectionist views unlikely to creep into 'optimistic' Canada

At the G20 conference in Hangzhou, China, Trudeau wasn't alone in renewing the pledge to save the world from inequality. Leaders from U.S. PresidentObama to Chinese president Xi Jinpingadded their voices. Other leaders, including those from Britain and Australia, chimed in.

Labour Day commitment

But as Hacker and his co-author Paul Piersonpoint out in their bookWinner-Take-All Politics,subtitled How Washington Made the RichRicher and Turned its Back on the Middle Class,the complex political process that moved wealth into the hands of the richest will bedifficult to reverse.

Insipid growth

Their book refutes the idea that globalization, technology or differences in education caused the lower and middle classes to get a reduced share of the pie beginning in the mid-1970s. Instead, they clearly blame a failure of politics and they insist that inequality is itself the cause of our current insipid growth.

"It's become increasingly clear that growing inequality isn't just a problem of fairness," Hacker told me in an email. "It also threatens the functioning of our democracy and the dynamism of our economy."

Hacker and Pierson, whose most recent book, American Amnesia,warns that the "war on government" has gone too far, describe a conscious move by business and the wealthy to lobby the U.S. in a way that weakened the democratic voice of the poor and middle-class majority.

The same process while the resulting inequality may not beso pronounced as in the U.S.happenedin Canada as well, according to DanielBland, a politicalsociologist who holds theprestigious Canada ResearchChair in Public Policy at the University of Saskatchewan.

Lobbying success

As a response to the growing power oforganized labour in the 1960s, business groups poured resources into lobbying governments forprovisions that ended up helping the wealthiest. Tax cuts that disproportionately favoured business and the rich were one of the results.

"These are people who are often close to politicians, business people and people who have more clout than the average citizen," says Bland.

In Canada, but especially in the U.S., he says, business lobbyistswere also successful in blocking laws that encouraged tradeunionsin the private sector.That severely weakened organized labour, one of the most powerful groups lobbying, not just for their members, but for the interests of the poor and middle class more broadly.

Quite reasonably, business groupsactin their own interests usingthe methodical, organizational skills that makes business a success.

Change happens between elections

Unlike flash-in-the-pan groups set up to contest elections, business groups persist, with most of their lobbying success coming between elections.

That means, even though voters may declare their preferences at election time, without strong and persistent organization, their voices can easily be drowned out as elected members are bombarded by well-funded lobby groups insisting that what's good for business is good for everyone.

While so many people worry about a stalled world economy,Chris Kutarna, a Canadian author and scholar at the University ofOxford, believes we are in the midst ofa miraculous economic, technical and cultural revival comparable to the Renaissance. He sees a time of ferment when ordinary people could reclaim their share of benefits being created by the information age.

Radical activism needed

Interviewed as part of a project on the theme of disruptionon CBC Radio's The Current,Kutarnasays that in such disruptive times groups wanting a share of thegains must fight hard, and that a fair distribution of the benefits is not going happenautomatically.

"The notion that we can just step back and let the positive consequences come to us is completely false," says Kutarna. "This is a time for radical activism, rather than waiting for the good things to come."

Trudeau has clearly stated that he wants all Canadians to feelthe benefit of growth, not just the one per cent. The question is whether the people who want it to happen can generateenough noise tomake him do it.

Follow Don on Twitter at @don_pittis

More analysis by Don Pittis