As Trudeau and Trump meet, farmers fear becoming a bargaining chip: Don Pittis - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 02:14 AM | Calgary | -11.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
BusinessAnalysis

As Trudeau and Trump meet, farmers fear becoming a bargaining chip: Don Pittis

Farmers across North America fear their industry will be used as a bargaining chip in a renegotiated trade deal. U.S. agriculture fears losing Mexican markets and Canadian producers fear importing U.S. problems.

Agriculture industry worries about disruption of integrated markets if NAFTA is reopened

The Canadian and U.S. red meat industry is so integrated that animals cross the border for winter feeding and sometimes return for slaughter. No one's sure how a border tax would affect such arrangements. (Jeff McIntosh/Canadian Press)

When heshowsa picture of U.S. President Donald Trump during a rural speakingtour, farmer and agricultural economist Philip Shaw getsquite a reaction.

"The room just erupts," he says.

"The story of 2017, for Canadian agriculture, there's one story and that's Donald Trump," says Shaw.

Despite the things they don't like about current trade rules, people in agriculture arenervous about what will happen should the North American Free Trade Agreement be reopened.

That nervousness is not found just in Canada, but in the U.S. and Mexico as well, in what has become a deeplyintegrated North American market in agricultural products.
Philip Shaw, farmer and agricultural economist, says Donald Trump's election will be the biggest thing to impact Canadian farmers in 2017. (Shaw family)

In farming circles, Shaw is a respected commentator on agricultural issues on both sides of the border. His talk on financial risk management where he showed the photo of Trump was part of a 10-stop "AgricultureRoadshow" sponsored by the tax and accounting partnership BDO Canada.

As a farmer,Shawhearswhat otherfarmers are saying. And people in many parts of the North American agriculture industryare afraid Trump will upset the apple cart.

"Farmers are talking about, they worry about, Donald Trump and how he may change the NAFTA agreement," says Shaw.

Many Canadians think of the United States as an industrial economy, but the U.S. has historically been a huge agricultural exporter. The farm lobby has a lot of clout in Congress, and the grain-producing"corn belt" voted solidly for Trump.

A 'farm bust'

Part of that votewas a protestbecauseall is not well in the U.S. farm sector. High prices a few years ago due to drought and surgingdemand from a growing Chinese middle class have turned to glut.

All that money invested by farmers in land and equipment is not resulting in hoped-for returns.

The U.S. remains a large exporter. But,as happened inthe run-up in oil prices, when agriculturalprices rose, countries around the world expanded food production, bringing 70million newhectares into cultivation.
U.S. farmer Grant Kimberley checks corn plants in 2016, near Maxwell, Iowa.The biggest market for U.S. corn is Mexico, and that has driven Mexican peasant farmers out of business. (Charlie Neibergall/Associated Press)

"The boom encouraged farmers in other countriesto ramp up production," said a report last weekin the Wall Street Journal titled The Next American Farm Bust Is Upon Us. "Lower production costs, proximity to fast-growing markets and improving infrastructure gave some overseas farmers an edge."

Now, North American farmers and agricultural industries are worried they could become a bargaining chip in a renegotiated NAFTA.

Mexico buysU.S.corn

For the United States, Mexico is the Number One importer of corn, dairy products, pork and rice. It's a close second and third in soybeans, beef,wheat and cotton. Any U.S. move totax Mexican car production could result in a countervailing barrier toagricultural products.

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeaumeets Trump today, Shaw is worried Canadianfarmers could be sacrificed to insure industrial access to the U.S. market.

The border between Canada and the United States for grain has been open for decades, he says. That means any disruption in U.S. exports could have an impact here.

But far more serious to Canadian farmerswould be concessions on dairy or changes in the rules on red meat.
Canada's dairy farmers fear they could be sacrificed in exchange for Canadian access to industrial markets, creating a race to the bottom on farm prices. (Natalia Goodwin/CBC)

"From a Canadian perspective, there might be a trade-off to save the auto industry by trading off access to the Canadian dairy market," says Shaw. He fears attempts to helpU.S. farm exports will just import American problems here.

It won't help Canadian consumers, he says, just the food industrymiddlemen. For farmers it's a race to starvation wages.

'America'first

Shaw says Trump's "America First" slogan, meaning United States first, is nerve-racking for Canadian meat producers who have foughta long battle with the U.S. over country-of-origin rulesthat declared Canadian beef foreign.

Like the auto industry, meat production is so integrated across the border, from feed to livestock to meat, that such rules are viewed by Canadian producers as pure protectionism.

"You have Canadian farmers with Canadian cows that go over to Colorado to be fed in the winter," says Shaw. "Sometimes they come back to be slaughtered in Canada and then the beef goes back to the United States."

How such intricate cross-border trade would be affected by a Trumpborder tax remains a mystery.
While trade figure show Mexico exports more agricultural produce to the U.S. than it imports, much of that flow comes from companies integrated into U.S. agribusiness, while peasant farmers suffer. (Carlos Jasso/Reuters)

Trump also paints a pictureofMexican workers and companies stealing U.S. jobs. But according to Judith Teichman, who has been studyingMexican political economy for years and writes a blog on the subject, U.S. agricultural exports have had a devastating effect on the Mexican economy.

She says balance-of-trade figures between the U.S. and Mexico are "fake accounting" that ignore the fact that Mexican exporters represent U.S. agribusinessfirms while U.S. corn exports have killed off jobs in subsistence agriculture.

"One of the things you have to remember is that when NAFTA was negotiated between the three countries Mexico was still an authoritarian regime," says Teichman, a professor at the University of Toronto. "They could happily ignore peasant producers and listen to other powerful groups."

She says with Mexican elections coming next year and a pro-farmer candidate leading the pack, that will no longer be the case if NAFTA is reopened now.

Follow Don on twitter @don_pittis

More analysis from Don Pittis