Rogers fines 91-year-old woman unable to return equipment due to lockdown - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 07:13 AM | Calgary | -0.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
BusinessGO PUBLIC

Rogers fines 91-year-old woman unable to return equipment due to lockdown

Telecommunications giants Rogers and Bell are being criticized for slapping penalties on customers hit hard by COVID-19. One business ethics expert says that with many customers working from home or in lockdown situations because of the pandemic, companies should be focusing on customer service, not profits.

Company reverses charges, promises to review policy after Go Public inquiries

Rogers wanted 91-year-old Joan Davis to pay almost $565 for failing to return internet and phone equipment while her long-term care facility was under lockdown. (Submitted by Lori Davis)

The family of a 91-year-old woman is outraged Rogers had demanded she pay hundreds of dollars for failing to return phone and internet equipment while her Ottawa long-term care home was under lockdown.

The family cancelled those services for Joan Davis in early May after noticing her dementia was worsening and she was struggling to use them.

They kept basic cable to help her pass the time. Her daughter, Lori Davis, says Rogers told the familya technician would pick up the equipment, but never showed.

What did show up was a bill for the unreturned equipment more than $450 which,by this month, had grown to almost $565.

"Rogers had no room forconsideration or compassion,"Lori, who lives in Kingston, Ont.,told Go Public."It's not about people, it's only about profits."

  • Got a story? Contact Rosa and theGo Publicteam

Lori says no matter how many times she tried to explain the situation to Rogers, she was given the same answer: return the equipment or pay the penalty; even thoughthe a long-term care facility was locked down with 30 COVID-19cases including Joan.

"I went for six months before I could touch my mom with a rubber glove on my hand, not knowing if she was going to actually make it or be like the other residents that had passed away," she said.

Rogers lacked "humanity," she said.

After hearing from Go Public, Rogerstook steps to address the situation, including waiving the charge.

But Lori is just one of about a dozen telco customers who contacted Go Public with complaints about Rogers and Bellcharging penalties for situations brought on by COVID-19that are out ofcustomers' control most dealing with financialhardship brought on by the pandemic.

Though their financial reports don't specify how their internet, cable and phone divisions did,Rogers Communications and Bell Canada Enterprises both made more than a billion dollars in the first nine months of the pandemic.Rogersnetted$1.24 billion and Bell $1.9 billionbetween March and December 2020, according to their reports.

UBC business ethics expert Christie Stephenson says businesses like telcos should be less worried about making money and more worried about helping customers during the pandemic. (Submitted by Christie Stephenson)

Business ethics expert Christie Stephenson says, at times like this, businesses that can afford to, like telcos, should set aside profits and concentrate on helping customers who are struggling.

"It's pretty hard to overstate the exceptionality of COVID on everyone [so] businesses have an opportunity to say, 'What can we reasonably do for customers and particularly vulnerable customers?'" said Stephenson, executive director of the Peter P. Dhillon Centre for Business Ethics at UBC's Sauder School of Business.

'She was in a room, isolated'

For two months, Lori had no idea the charges were coming, even though she handles the billing.Rogers gives customers 60 days to return equipment before applying charges.

By July, the bill included more than $450 for the equipment.

"I was rather startled that there was thischarge for equipment that we weren't using,couldn't return, and originally told we weren't to touch," Lori said.

The company'sterms of service stateconsumers are responsible for access to any equipment and for returning any rented equipment upon cancellation of a service agreement.

Adding insult to injury, Lori says, while she was trying to deal with those charges, Rogers cut off her mother's basic cable for failing to pay the equipment fees leaving the senior with no ties to the outside world.

WATCH | Rogers charged senior in locked-down nursing home for failing to return equipment:

Rogers charged senior for not returning equipment during nursing home lockdown | Go Public

3 years ago
Duration 2:13

The cable part of the bill was paid up.

"She was in a room isolated by herself We were not allowed to visit. So she was very depressed because she was ill and lonely," Lori said.

According to the Television Service Provider Codea mandatory code of conduct for all licensed television service providers companiesneed to give customers 10 days' written notice when cable service will be disconnected, explain why, and outline the cost to reconnect the service, among other things.Lori says the family didn't get any notice.

She blames Rogerspolicies for what happened to her mom.

"I'm not looking for an apology. I want to see the policy change some guidelines. There should be some protocol when going after people for billing."

Visitors to her mom's long-term care facility were finally allowed back inside residents' rooms on Feb. 14.

While Lori Davis was trying to work out the equipment charges, Rogers cancelled the remaining basic cable service her mom had been paying all along. (Submitted by Lori Davis)

After Go Public contacted Rogers, itapologized to the family, reversed the charges, reconnected the cableand gave Joan three months offree cable service.

"As we looked into Ms. Davis'sexperience, we found that as a result of the pandemic, our process for returning equipment doesn't reflect the challenging circumstances many of our customers continue to face in these times, including lockdowns in long-term care facilities like hers,"Eric Agius, chief customer officer at Rogers wrote in an email to Go Public.

"We've started an immediate review to look at what went wrong and take every necessary step to prevent this from happening in the future."

'Screwing over the little guy'

Ben Wilkinson also wants to see policy changes after his experience with Bell.

He and his brother are in the process of closing their live music business, Junction City Music Hall in Toronto. The business hasn't been open for shows since last March due to COVID-19.

Ben Wilkinson stands in front of the live music venue, Junction City Music Hall, he and his brother opened in 2014. They are now in the process of losing the business due to COVID-19. (Mark Bochsler/CBC)

The brothers contacted Bell in November, looking to cancel both theirinternet and landline accounts and were told, because of automatically renewing contracts, they are on the hook for a $1,000 termination fee.

When the billcame, Bell had waived the $500 fee for the cancellation ofinternet service, but not for the landline.

"I asked if we could avoid the [landline] fee," Wilkinson told Go Public about his followup call to the company in mid-February.

"They said, as a matter of course, currently they are not doing anything for any customers of theirs that had to close or change your business plans to the pandemic. I feel like they're screwing over the little guy. Taking money where they can."

In an email to Go Public, Bell spokesperson Nathan Gibson wrote that the company has "stepped up" for its customers during the pandemic, including "waiving internet overage charges, providing free TV and other services, and working with impacted customers including small businesses to manage their accounts."

Go Public asked how many customers had charges waived since March 2020 and the total amount that was waived, but Bell says those numbers are not available.

Gibson says the company will be following up with Wilkinson, "to see whether there are any other ways we can further assist him."

15,713 complaints and counting

There have been 15,713 billing complaints filed against telecom companies since the beginning of the pandemic (March 2020 to February 2021), compared to 20,111in the previous 12 months, according to the Commission for Complaints for Telecom-Television Services (CCTS), anindependent, industry-funded organization created to resolvetelco complaints.

The CCTS tells Go Public it handles "every complaint individually" and considers outlying factors like COVID-19, as set out in itsProcedural Code, when making decisions.

Stephenson, theethics expert, says it shouldn't have to come to that.

"I think everyone's looking at businesses and asking how responsible they are in a crisis. This is a perfect opportunity for companies to really show what they stand for," she said.

Lori says she'll follow up with Rogers to see what comes of its policy review, and if any changes are made.

"[Right now] you're not dealing with people, you're dealing with a policy. And the policy says you haven't paid your bill," she says. "That needs to change."

Wilkinson is hoping his complaint might lead to policy changes at Bell too.

Lori, here with Joan, was able to enter her mom's room at the long-term care facility for the first time in months on Feb. 14. (Submitted by Lori Davis)

Submit your story ideas

Go Public is an investigative news segment on CBC-TV, radio and the web.

We tell your stories, shed light on wrongdoingand hold the powers that be accountable.

If you have a story in the public interest, or if you're an insider with information, contactGoPublic@cbc.cawith your name, contact information and a brief summary. All emails are confidential until you decide to Go Public.

Follow@CBCGoPublicon Twitter.

Read more storiesby Go Public.

Clarifications

  • An earlier version of this story said Ben Wilkinson and his brother had contacted Bell in November, looking to cancel their landline and were told, because of an automatically renewing contract, they were on the hook for a $580 termination fee. In fact, they were looking to cancel both internet and landline accounts and were told, because of an automatically renewing contract, they were on the hook for a $1,000 termination fee. When the bill came, Bell had waived half the fee, and Wilkinson asked the company whether it could also waive the landline fee.
    Mar 15, 2021 9:46 AM ET

With files by Jenn Blair