Sears Canada's future is in doubt. How did it come to this? - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 11, 2024, 02:06 AM | Calgary | -0.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Business

Sears Canada's future is in doubt. How did it come to this?

Retailer Sears Canada is on the ropes, warning investors that it might have to restructure its business or seek a buyer. The corporate crisis is decades in the making, say retail analysts.

Walmart, online shopping and a U.S. financier each played a role, experts say

Polyester knitwear was all the rage in this 1973 Simpsons-Sears catalogue. Older Canadians may still remember mail-order catalogues from Sears Canada's golden days, but the retailer has fallen on hard times lately. (CBC Still Photo Collection/Simpsons-Sears catalogue, Fall/Winter 1973)

Sears Canada is on the ropes, warninginvestors yesterday about "significant doubt" that it can continuewithout restructuring its business or seeking a buyer.

That might surprise some older Canadians who can stillrecall Sears Canada's glory days. The Canadian company launched in 1952as a mail-order partnership between Sears Roebuck Co. in the U.S. and Toronto's Robert Simpson Company, and opened the first Simpsons-Sears store in Stratford, Ont., in 1953.

ButSears Canada's troubles have been years in the making,according to retail experts, predating even the rise of online shopping.

The mail-order and department store model was certainly successful, for a time.

"They depended on the idea that because they had this huge selection, people would just come automatically to shop at those stores," said retail analyst Maureen Atkinson, a senior partner with J.C. Williams Group.

Then, in 1994, Walmart launched in Canada, bringing deep discounts north of the border.

"They really took out that low-price end of [department stores'] business," said Atkinson.

Sears Canada announced in late 2013 it was selling off five major locations across Canada, including its flagship Eaton Centre location in downtown Toronto. (Andy Clark/Reuters)

Department stores like Sears Canada, and itsarch-rival the Hudson's Bay Co., responded by moving towardamedium- to higher-priced business model, said Atkinson. But over time that business was "picked off" by specialty retailers.

Atkinson believes Sears Canada missed its chance to build an effective online business and compete with the e-commerce players who obliterated department stores' traditional advantage in product selection.

"They started off with really the only functional catalogue business in Canada, so they should have been the natural online winner in Canada," she said.

That window of online opportunity has come and gone, and so is much of the cash that could have easedan effective transformation.

Womens' gowns advertised in a 1973 Simpsons-Sears catalogue. Sears Canada launched in 1952 as a mail-order partnership between Sears Roebuck Co. in the U.S. and Toronto's Robert Simpson Company (CBC Still Photo Collection/Simpsons-Sears catalogue, Fall/Winter 1973)

"The company is 60 or 70 per cent smaller than it was at peak," said Antony Karabus, CEO of HRC Retail Advisory.

"It's very hard to cut sufficient costs and invest sufficiently in systems and merchandise development when your business has dropped over 70 per cent in 10-plus years."

At the same time, repeated leadership changes since 2011 left the company without a consistent direction, saidKarabus.

"Every two years there's a new CEO, and he or she has a different idea," he said. "And the company is going through these gyrations, dropping in size every single quarter as they sell off their best assets."

Retail expert Maureen Atkinson says Sears Canada missed its chance to build an effective online business and compete with the e-commerce players. (Paul Sakuma/Associated Press)

In late 2013, Sears Canada announced it was selling off five major locations across Canada, including its flagship Eaton Centre location in downtown Toronto.

Not long after, Sears Canada exported cash to the U.S. when it paid abig dividendto shareholders, includingU.S. hedge fund manager EdwardLampert. At the time, Lampertowned 28 per cent of Sears Canada through his hedge fund and another 10 per cent personally. U.S. parent company Sears Holding Corp., of which Lampert was chairman and CEO,owned 51 per cent of Sears Canada.That dividend payment was preceded by three other special dividends, one in 2012 and two in 2010.

Atkinson said some of the blame for Sears Canada's current woes rests squarely on Lampert's shoulders.

"He took away all of their ability to modernize, to do what they needed to do, which was really change dramatically," she said.

The 1973 Simpsons-Sears catalogue featured 'handsome co-ordinating slacks' for men. (CBC Still Photo Collection/Simpsons-Sears catalogue, Fall/Winter 1973)

Mark Cohen was CEO of Sears Canada from 2001 to 2004. Without mentioning Lampert by name, Cohen criticized the financier's treatment of Sears Canada in a Tuesday interview with Peter Armstrong, host of CBC News Network's On the Money.

"There's nothing about what Sears Canada has historically represented in the marketplace that would suggest it could nottodaybe large, profitable, viable, able to grow," said Cohen, who is now director of retail studies at Columbia Business School in New York.

"When you start to sell off your best stores for cash, and you dividend out that cash to your principal shareholder rather than reinvest that money in the business itself, you're setting in motion a process which leads us to where we are today," he said.

Sears Canada seeks buyer

7 years ago
Duration 10:30
Mark Cohen is a former CEO of Sears Canada and is now the director of retail studies at Columbia Business School

Asked for his opinion on the future of Sears Canada, Cohen was pessimistic.

"There's always the possibility that someone with very deep pockets could show up and decide to provide the company with a significant lifeline, but the likelihood of that is probably not very great," he said.

"Again, the company has sold off among its very best stores. It's lost an enormous amount of its experienced, committed talent. You would have to recreate the organization almost from scratch. You'd have to restore the company's trust in the eyes of customers, which is something that, arguably, would never be able to be accomplished."

With files from The Canadian Press, Kate MacNamara, Zena Olijnyk and Gillian Wheatley