Wall Street reacts to Trump with a shrug despite pro-business bluster

Donald Trump is running for president onthe premise that his business acumenmakes him the best man for the job, but reaction from the business community Tuesday suggests that's far from the consensus view.

In Monday night's presidential debate, the Republican candidate talked about things like cutting personal taxes to the lowest level seen since the Reagan administration, cutting the corporate tax rate to 15 per cent from 35 and loosening regulations on a slew of American industries.

• Income tax, ISIS facts and stamina: key moments from Monday's debate

Ordinarily, pronouncements like that would be music to the ears of a Wall Street audience. Yet the reaction to Trump's presidential run has been counterintuitive: when it looks like he might win, the markets getscared.

Tuesday's reaction was no different, as investors staged a mini "Clinton rally" once the consensus view that the Democrat had managed to out-reason her Republican foe's meandering bluster. "U.S. stocks ended higher yesterday, aftertraders deemed that Hillary Clinton benefited most fromMonday'spresidential debate," said BMO economistPriscilla Thiagamoorthy in a note on Wednesday.

Dow and S&P futures rallied through the evening and before markets opened on Tuesday. Gold prices, which typically go up during times of fear and uncertainty, lost ground. "The tension on the gold market appears to have eased initially," Commerzbank said in a research note, "after most observers agree that the presidential candidate Hillary Clinton clearly came out on top."

Investment bank Morgan Stanley puts the odds of a Trump victory at about 30 per cent, but still advised clients in a note Tuesday that the "tail risk" of a Trump victory "cannot be dismissed" and as such investors may want to stay on the sidelines for a while.

While the bank is expecting a Clinton victory, the most likely outcome is still a Democrat in the White House with Republicans controlling Congress. Which is why the "the next president may only be able to make slow progress, if any, toward their goals," the bank noted.

• DON PITTIS: Avoiding crazy is Canada's best economic policy

Scotiabank economist Derek Holt said Clinton didn't hurt her chances on Monday, something that could bode well for the U.S. economy down the line. "Personally I thought she won the debate hands down and exhibited a mastery of the substantive issues that eluded Trump's angry persona," he said.

Regardless of who wins, in most elections investors are just hoping for stability.

Trump's new tax plan

8 years ago

Duration 7:09

Marc Goldwein, senior vice-president for the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, on Donald Trump's economic policy speech in Detroit

To that end,Societe Generale strategistKit Juckesput his views on Monday's debatesuccinctly: "The press verdict on the first U.S. presidential debate is that Hillary Clinton 'won', but Donald Trump didn't lose badly enough to really reduce the uncertainty."

Peso rallies

Currency markets breathed a sigh of relief, however, as the peso rallied more than two per cent starting from just after the debate began.

Prior to the debate, the Mexican peso had been near an all-time low of around20 to $1 US on fears that a Trump win would slam the brakes on trade between the two countries, as the United States is Mexico's largest trading partner by far.

• Donald Trump says his taxes are 'none of your business'

One Wall Street icon who was a definite loser Mondaywas Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen, whom Trumpaccused of trying to help the Democrats by refusing to raise interest rates until after the election.

"We have a Fed that's doing political things ...by keeping interest rates at this level," Trump said. "The day Obama goes off playing golf for the rest of his life, when they raise interest rates, you are going to see some bad things happen."

• Clinton slams Trump's 'outlandish'ideas in stump speech

Those statements could be bad news for the U.S. economy in and of themselves, as they could be enough to compel a change at the world's most powerful central bank something that would lead to the sort of instability that markets hate.

"Frankly the veracity of Trump's claims are irrelevant," economist Paul Ashworth at Capital Economicssaid."It doesn't even matter if Trump himself believes them if those claims are made publicly to a viewing audience of up to 100 million Americans, and a majority of those Americans then go on to vote for Trump in November's election, then what choice does Yellen have?"

• Donald Trump in the White House? Polls show Canadians are getting worried

Trump may not have as many backers on Wall Street as he likes to think, but ultimately his biggest problem from the investment community may not be hostility but ratherapathy:they've got other things to worry about.

"While the perceived debate winner or loser might have been a factor in early equity trading,"KevinGiddisatRaymond James said, "the ...market is focused on other things, mainly concerns over certain banks, and their sustainability."

As Scotiabank's Holt put it: "The U.S. election is hardly the only thing on market minds."