B.C. court certifies class-action lawsuit against makers of Alesse birth control pills - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 11:29 PM | Calgary | 0.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

B.C. court certifies class-action lawsuit against makers of Alesse birth control pills

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has given the green light for a class-action lawsuit to proceed against the makers of Alesse birth control pills.

Women claim negligence by Pfizer and Wyeth resulted in unexpected pregnancies

Taylor MacKinnon is the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against Pfizer Canada Inc. and Wyeth Canada. A B.C. Supreme Court judge has certified the proceeding. (Taylor MacKinnon)

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has given the green light for a class-action lawsuit to proceed against the makers of Alesse birth control pills.

In a decision released Tuesday, Justice Karen Horsmanfound that two women who claim they got pregnant in 2017 while taking Alessehave met the bar needed to pursue a negligence claim againstpharmaceutical companiesPfizer Canada and Wyeth Canada.

The class action applies to Canadians who took the pills between Jan. 1, 2017, and April 30, 2019.The judge's ruling is not a decision on the merits of the claim.

Problems with Alesse came to light in December 2017 when Health Canada issued an advisory about reports that two lots of Alesse contained pills that were roughly half the proper size.

The warnings concerned Alesse 21, which contains21 pink active tablets, taken before a seven-day break, and Alesse 28, whichcontains seven white "reminder" pills to be taken after the 21 active pills.

Customers were advised to check their packages and return them to a pharmacy if they contained unusual pills. The health agency followed up with general advisories reminding women to check their pills for inconsistencies before taking them.

Unexpected pregnancies

Taylor MacKinnonhad been taking Alesse since 2014. She received a positive pregnancy test on Dec. 16, 2017, ten days after her pharmacist told her about the Health Canada warning.

According to Horsman's ruling, MacKinnon left her name and number with Health Canada and with Pfizer, but never heard back from either party.

Here is a side view of the Alesse 28 blister pack with a small piece missing from one of the pills, circled in red. Health Canada issued a warning about the deficiencies in 2017. (Health Canada)

She gave birth to a daughter in August 2018 when she was 24.

"She wished to have children someday but not at such a young age," the ruling says. "She would have preferred that she and her partner were more established in their careers and financially stable before having children."

Alyssa McIntoshfound outshe was pregnant while taking Alesse in October 2017 before the Health Canada advisory. She suffered a miscarriage between six and nine weeks later.

MacKinnon's pills were from the lot that was the subject of the Health Canada warning but McIntosh's were not.

The two women both claim they became pregnant as a result of negligence by Pfizer and Wyeth.

They are suing for general damages, income lossand the cost ofpurchasing Alesse when the product was defective.

According to the ruling, they claim that testing shows even pills that were not broken or chipped contained lower than expected amounts ofestrogen one of the key elements in suppressing ovulation.

The womenhave also accused the two pharmaceutical firms of misleading or deceptive practices and of failing to properly disclose all the risks associated with the drug.

At least 138 potential claimants

According to Horsman's ruling, at least 138 people have contacted the law firm handling the claim about their experience taking Alesse.

"The Health Canada Adverse Reaction online database lists 38 women who provided adverse reaction reports for Alesse," the judge wrote.

A B.C. judge has certified a class action lawsuit against the makers of Alesse birth control pills.

"The total number of class members will only be known with reasonable certainty once notice is issued and individuals come forward."

To certify a class-action lawsuit, a judgeis not supposed to decide the factsof the claim, but to determine if it has five componentsneeded to continue: a cause of action; a class of two or more people; common issues to be argued; a representative plaintiff and a determination that a class action is more appropriate than individual claims.

The two companies argued that MacKinnon and McIntosh had not met any of the requirements.

They alleged that the claims were too broad and that they had not shown thatcommon issues existed.

One of their scientific experts also argued that the level of estrogen measured by the lab hired by the law firm would not have reduced the effectiveness of the Alesse pills.

Horsman noted that the companies had made submissions indicating they complied with Health Canada's standards, but she said that's an argument they can make at trial.

The ruling means the lawyers for the two representative women can now move ahead with plans that include notifyingproposed members of the class action of its existence, producing documents for discovery and exchanging expert reports.

The claims have not been proven in court.