How the feet of 15 cadavers became a part of the outgoing mayor of Surrey's public mischief trial

Could a foul-mouthed political opponent have run over the mayor of Surrey's foot?

Doug McCallum's lawyers drew on evidence Wednesdaythat included rolling a VW Passat overthe feet of 15 cadavers to say perhaps.

Defence counselEric Gottarditold the provincial court judge overseeing McCallum's public mischief trial the Crown had fallen"markedly shortof the standard of proof" needed to convict the 78-year-old of falsely accusing a political opponent of a criminal offence.

And that"regardless of any advertent or inadvertent embellishments" McCallum might have made when he told RCMP that Debi Johnstonedrove her Mustang over his foot, the outgoing mayor was justified in filing a police complaint against her.

"We say that the evidence will establish that the underlying facts which arise from the incident between Mr. McCallum and Ms. Johnstonewhen viewed in totality and in context amply support the complaint that Mr. McCallum made to the RCMP," Gottardi said.

"A complaint essentially of hit and run and criminal harassment."

CSI meets JFK

Gottardi launched the defence's case after the Crown wrapped its submissions Tuesday following two days of testimony from Johnstone and the RCMP's primary investigator on McCallum's file.

The Crown claims McCallum lied to RCMP about an encounter in a Save-On-Foods parking lot on Sept. 4 that started with Johnstone yelling 'Resign McCallum" from heropen-top convertible and ended with her driving away after what she called a "heated debate,"during which sheswore at him repeatedly andcalled him scaly-faced.

Johnstone, a member of Keep The RCMP in Surrey, a group opposed to McCallum's plans for a municipal police force,told police she thought it was her "lucky day" when she saw an opportunity to confront the mayor in person.

The entire incident was caught on CCTVfootage taken from inside the grocery store, but a shrub obscures McCallum's left foot and the rear tire of Johnstone's vehicle.

According to evidence presented by the Crown, police noted that McCallum did not appear to limp in the minutes after he claimed to have been run over.

He also told policeJohnstone "pinned" him against his car something which cannot be seen in the video.

To counter those suspicions, Gottardi called two expert witnesses whose testimony played out like CSI meetsJFK, complete with a foot skeleton and grainy slowed-down, blown-upvideo of the crucial seconds.

'Foot and Ankle International'

Biomechanical engineer Dennis Chimichtook the stand first.

Chimich, an expert on the mechanics of injury, reviewed both the CCTV footage and McCallum's hospital records, concluding thatswelling on the front of the mayor'sleft foot was consistent with damage reported in studies involving the running over of feet by cars.

The most notable of those was a 2007 study involving cadaver feet and the VW Passat.

Chimich said researchers put the "flash frozen" feet in various types of footwear before running over them,dissecting them andtaking X-rays, ultimately finding that bone injuries were "not to be expected" at lower speeds.

He used the foot skeleton which Gottardi established was not taken from a cadaver to show the judge where the purported damage was.

Under cross-examination, Crown counsel Richard Fowler asked Chimich about the extent of his research, noting that one journal is dedicated entirely to feet and ankles.

It's called Foot and Ankle International.Fowler said he doesn't subscribe.

The prosecutor pointed out that feetcan swell for any number of reasons, including kidney problems and age-related issues. But the exchange led to a debate as to whether that was a subject which lay beyond Chimich's expertise.

Fowler returned to the question about other causes of swelling later in the day when the radiologist who examined McCallum's X-rays took the stand.

"You're not able to say what degree of soft tissue swelling may have been present the day before or week before, is that correct?" Fowler asked him.

"Thatis correct," the radiologist said.

'The rear wheel could track'

Gottardi's second witness was a mechanical engineer who used special software to create a 3-D aerial image of the parking lot where McCallum and Johnstone clashed.

Bradley Heinrichsslowed the CCTV footage down to the point where he inched through frame by frame in increments of one-thirtieth of a second.

Viewed that way, he said,McCallum "appeared to look down and his arms jerk back" as the rear wheel of the Mustang passed his left foot.

Heinrichsanalyzed the car's arc through the parking spot relative to McCallum's position to conclude that"ifyou're standing close enough, the rear wheel could track" over his left foot.

He also said that it was impossible to tell from the video whether the mayor's gait changed after the encounter.

On cross-examination, Heinrichs agreed with Fowler's assertion that McCallum"appears to start walking almost immediately behind the vehicle" after Johnstone drove away.

The prosecutor zeroed in on the main shortcoming of the video the shrubs and curb that hide both tire and foot from view: agrassy knoll, so to speak.

"You can't say from your review of the video precisely where he was standing, so, therefore, you can't say from your review of the video whether his foot was run over?" Fowler asked Heinrichs.

Heinrichs agreed.

The trial resumes next Tuesday.