End of election blackout puts B.C. in 'anomalous situation' - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 04:58 AM | Calgary | -1.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

End of election blackout puts B.C. in 'anomalous situation'

Canadian election results will not be blacked out today meaning voters in B.C. could find out how Atlantic Canada voted before their own polls close.

UBC's Richard Johnston explains why bans on reporting Eastern results have ended

A voter emerges from a polling station in Mount Pearl, N.L. on election day. Could B.C. voters find out how Newfoundlanders voted before their own polls close? (Paul Daly/Canadian Press)

Canadian election results are not blacked out across the country today meaning voters in B.C. will likely have some idea how Atlantic Canada voted before polling stations on the West Coast close tonight.

This year, in an attempt to ensure most results are availablearound the same time on election night, Elections Canada has staggered opening hours for polling stations across the country.

For example, in Quebec and Ontario, polls are open from 9:30 a.m. to9:30 p.m. local time, compared to Albertaand Saskatchewan, where polls are open from 7:30 a.m. to7:30 p.m.local time. That meansCanadians across that wide swath of the country, with Manitoba in the middle, all votesimultaneously.

The first results from the East Coastare expected to start trickling in around 4:30 p.m. PT, even though polling stations in British Columbia will not close until7:00 p.m.

It was not always thus, explains Richard Johnston, aprofessor of political science at UBC election blackouts were made law in 1938.

"The concern was that voters in some parts of the country would have information that others wouldn't, basically information about votes already cast," Johnston told CBC'sThe Early Edition.

"The worry was either there'd be an impact on turnout, i.e. discouraging it, or that it might even facilitate strategic voting by some people as an option that wasn't available to others."

Limited evidence of impacts

Johnston, who is also the Canada research chair in public opinion, elections and representation, says those concerns have not been backed up by any Canadianevidence.

The lack of an election blackout in the U.S. could have affected the presidential election of 1980, which saw Ronald Reagan elected by a landslide. (Scott Stewart/Associated Press)

But he says there is evidence out of the U.S., where there are no such blackouts.

Johnston points to the 1980 U.S. presidential election, whichthrew up "one of the biggest surprise results" the landslide election of Ronald Reagan over Jimmy Carter.

Based on exit polls, NBC News projected Reagan as the winner before polling stationseven closed on the West Coast.

The broadcaster was criticized afterwards, amid claimsitsearly projection not only lowered voter turnout in the Westbut also adversely impacted close elections inWestern states.

Nevertheless,Johnston says, despite its apparent impact ondemocracy, back in Canada, there was only "summary justice" for broadcasters who violated blackouts in elections, with some facing fines of only $500.

Not first time for B.C. voters

Perhaps the biggest Canadian case of blackout violation erupted duringthe 2000federal election, when B.C. software developer Paul Bryan published results from Atlantic Canada online.

Paul Bryan, a B.C. software developer, was convicted of violating the election blackout when he published early results online in 2000. ((Fred Chartrand/The Canadian Press))

Bryan was charged with violating the Elections Act, but argued in B.C. provincial court thatthe chargeswere unconstitutional. Initially, he lost the case and was fined $1,000.

But in 2003, the B.C.Supreme Court overturned the conviction, striking down thegag law section of the Elections Act.

That decision allowed media organizations to tell voters in Western Canada the results of the 2004 federal election while polling stations in B.C. were still open.

However, after three more years of appeals and legal wrangling, theSupreme Court of Canada ruled the Elections Act was constitutional and Bryan lost his case. He was fined $1,000, says Johnston.

Social media changed everything

By 2008, Johnstonsays, everything had changed. The advent of social media meant Canadians on the East Coastcould nowsend early results to voters in Western Canada.

It was a pattern that was repeated in the 2011 federal election.Still, Johnston says he isn't very concerned about the impact on voters in B.C.

"Really you're talking about people who have chosen not yet to vote, or who have not had the opportunity to vote... and voters would have to have a pretty rich bodyof information to act on this.

"The fact the poll has closed in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia doesn't actually mean that we know the result...it could be another hour or more. There could be additional delay."

Why not delay vote count?

One way to prevent the sharing of East Coast results before West Coast polls close could be to delay the vote count. (CBC)

Nevertheless, Johnston says, there's still an inequity.

"There's no getting around the fact there is this anomalous situation in which we actually could have more information than our cousins to the East."

He says if Elections Canada really wanted to tackle the problem directly, they could delay the start of vote counting across the country until the polls have closed nationwide.

"If you're really serious about that, what you really need to do is not count the result or not report in the first instance...You could basically cut it off at the source. But there seems to be no willingness to do that."