Former B.C. Legislature clerk of the house pleads not guilty as breach of trust trial begins

One of the most hotly anticipated trials in recent B.C. political history kicked off Monday in B.C. Supreme Court as a man described as the former "chief executive officer" of the province's legislature pleaded not guilty to breach of trust.

Craig James is accused of using his position as clerk of the house to improperly access benefits rangingin scale from a quarter-million dollar retirement payoutto expense items including cufflinks anda Union Jack pillow embroidered with the words "God Save The Queen."

He's also alleged to have spearheadeda decision to use legislature funds to purchase a wood splitterand trailer that was kept at his home.

The Crown's opening statement included a reference to the standards of conductexpected of all employees of B.C.'s Legislative Assembly rules that forbid any conflict between professional duties and personal interests.

"Mr James was no ordinary employee. As the parliamentary equivalent of a CEO, he had a responsibility to the institution and the people of British Columbia to manage the affairs andresources of the legislature in an exemplary manner," said prosecutor David Butcher.

"The Crown alleged that Mr. James' conduct, at different times and in different ways, was a marked departure from the standard of responsible management expected of a person occupying one of the highest offices in the province."

'The clerk wears two hats'

The trial is being held in Vancouver, instead of Victoria home to the legislature where James worked from 1987 until his resignation in 2019, months after he was placed on administrative leave and led off the grounds by police under a cloud of suspicion.

James uttered the words "not guilty" five times Monday morning as a court clerk read aloud the specifics of three charges of breach of trust and two charges of fraud.

Butcher then went on to explain the workings of government that saw James act as both an adviser to the house speaker and overseer of the 300 administrative employees who provide non-partisan support to the politicians tasked by voters to run the province.

James began his career at the legislative assemblyas a clerk of committee stepping into the top role as clerk of the house on Sept. 1, 2011.

In that role, he reported to the house Speaker but was also expected to act entirely independently from government to manage and direct the assembly's administrative policies and resources.

"The clerk wears two hats: they are an adviser and a manager who assists the members of the assembly to carry on their business of considering, developing and promulgating laws and policies;however they're also the chief executive officer of the assembly administration," Butcher said.

"As the assembly is funded entirely and exclusively with public funds, the requirement of responsible financial stewardship is an an important component of the clerk's CEO position."

'It would have been utterly useless'

The six-week trial will be conducted by Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes the same judge who recently concluded extradition proceedings against Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou.

Butcher gave a brief outline of the chargesagainst James starting with the allegationthat he improperly advanced a claim for a $257,988.38 retirement allowance in February 2012.

Previous investigations into the accusations have established thatthe payment was made according to a retirement benefit program that existed from 1984 to 1987, when it was terminated.

James' successor, Kate Ryan-Lloyd, is expected to testify about a $118,916 retirement payment issued to her at the same time a lump sumshe voluntarily returned immediately.

Butcher said other witnesses would testify about James' interest in the wood splitter, envisionedas a tool for catastrophic emergencies, in case it was needed to clear debris or cut wood for fires to stay warm.

James allegedly collected the wood splitter himself from a supplier in Sidney, before driving to Aldergroveto pick up a trailer in the fall of 2017.

"Mr. James took both pieces of equipment to his house in suburban Victoria, which is 13.4 kilometres from the legislature," Butcher said.

"It would have been utterly useless in an emergency while stored at his residence."

The prosecutor also read from oneemail in whichJames allegedly called the machine a "beauty" and another in which he allegedly told theformer house sergeant-at-arms: "Picked up the woodsplitter. May try it tomorrow. You will love it."

Butcher said the third area of alleged breach of trust would concern the expenses James allegedly submitted for travel and items related to personal use.

The first witness is scheduled to be a policeexhibits officer expected to testify about items seized by RCMPalong with those returned by James' wife to the legislature.

Butcher said the exhibits include books about the monarchy, beekeeping and whiskey. They also include sets of stamps and coins commemorating the British Royals as well as cufflinks and the Union Jack pillow.

A 'serious and marked' departure?

A total of 27 witnesses are expected to take the stand by the end of the proceedings. The defence will make its opening statement after the Crown closes itscase.

Butcher said the Crown needs to prove five points essential to making a charge of breach of trust stick against a a public official.

The first two elements are not really in question: that the accused is a public official and that they acted in accordance with the duties of their office.

The trial will centre on the other three elements: an accused has to have breached conduct demanded by the nature of their office; the conduct has to represent a "serious and marked" departure from behaviour expected of someone in that position,and they have to have acted with the intention of usingpublic office forsomething other than doing public good.