Enbridge oil spill worries B.C. pipeline critics - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 01:37 PM | Calgary | -11.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Enbridge oil spill worries B.C. pipeline critics

An oil spill on an Enbridge pipeline in Wisconsin has critics in British Columbia questioning the safety of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.

Pipeline problems

12 years ago
Duration 2:19
An oil spill in Wisconsin has opponents worried about the proposed Enbridge pipeline

An oil spill on an Enbridge pipeline in Wisconsin has critics in B.C. questioning the safety of the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.

About 1,200 barrels (190,000 litres)seeped out of an Enbridge pipelinein Wisconsin, which was delivering Canadian crude to Chicago-area refineries. According to Reuters, Enbridgeplans toreplace the leaky Wisconsin oil pipeline Monday, though it is not clear when the line will restart.

Aboutthree million litres of heavy crudespilled from a ruptured Enbridge pipelineinto the Kalamazoo River in 2010. Investigators with the U.S. Transportation Safety Board released their findings earlier this month and ripped into the company, noting it did nothing for 17 hours after oil started gushing and that it knew about small cracks in the pipeline for five years.

While officials with Enbridge say the situation in Wisconsinis being treated as a top priority, that doesn't reassure environmental groups and native communities that have staunchly opposed the Northern Gateway Pipeline proposal.

"I think the U.S. and Canadian authorities that regulate the pipeline should immediately suspend operation permits and licensing and conduct a full scale inquiry into the operations and safety practices of Enbridge," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, president of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs.

B.C. NDP Leader Adrian Dix is heading to Terrace,B.C.,on Monday to meet with aboriginal leaders about the pipeline. He also plans to visit Kitimat, the western terminus for the Northern Gateway, where 500,000 barrels of oil a day would be loaded aboard tankers and shipped overseas.

For Dix, the Wisconsin spill shows yet again just how risky a pipeline through British Columbia could be.

"This just builds on other evidence that this is not in B.C.'s economic or environmental interest and shows the folly of attempting to sacrifice environmental risk for B.C. money," he said.

Seeking reassurances

The pipeline must pass a National Energy Board review, which is currently underway. B.C. will get its chance to cross-examine Enbridge this fall.

[IMAGEGALLERY galleryid=2728 size=small]

"We need to be assured by the company, the National Energy Board and authorities on the coast that there are systems in place that will be able to minimize the risk and response to risks without the taxpayer being left with a problem," said B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake.

The review is expected to wrap up sometime in 2013.

The $5.5-billion, 1,177-kilometre Northern Gateway project would bring bitumen to Kitimat from the Alberta oilsands. The company recently announced a slate of safety improvements,including thicker pipe and better monitoring, that pushed the project's pricetag by $500 million to $6 billion.

Northern Gateway isat the centre of an argumentbetween B.C. Premier Christy Clark and Alberta Premier Alison Redford over how to fairly divvy up the project's risks and rewards.

Corrections

  • An earlier version of this story said about 300 million litres of crude oil spilled from the Enbridge pipeline in July 2010. In fact, more than three million litres leaked from the pipeline.
    Aug 01, 2012 1:40 PM PT