Guns in as evidence in Bacons' trial - Action News
Home WebMail Thursday, November 14, 2024, 01:16 PM | Calgary | 7.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Guns in as evidence in Bacons' trial

Four handguns found by police in an SUV will be allowed into evidence at the trial of two Abbotsford, B.C., brothers facing ten weapons related charges.
Jamie Bacon, flanked by two police officers as he was arrested outside his home, is standing trial on weapons charges. (CBC)

Four handguns found by police in an SUV will be allowed into evidence at the trial of two Abbotsford, B.C., brothers facing ten weapons related charges.

The lawyers for Jarrod and Jamie Bacon had argued that the discovery of the guns should not become evidence in the case because their clients' consitutional rights had been violated in the search.

Judge Jean Lytwyn announced the ruling Thursday in B.C. Provincial Court in Surrey.

The case against the Bacon brothers stems from an incident in April 2007 when unknown assailants shot Jamie Bacon, then 21, in the driveway of his parents home in Surrey.

Police investigating the shootingthen searched the home but did not havea warrant to do so, defence lawyers said.

During the search, investigators discovered photos on a computer that showedsecret compartments in a vehicle.

Police then searched a vehicle allegedly used by the brothers parked in the garage of the home and found a hidden compartment containing four semi-automatic handguns and five clips of bullets.

Some rights violated

"The court ruled that there were some Charter [of Rights] violations in the police conduct," said Crown prosecutor spokesman Neil MacKenzie.

Jarrod Bacon prior to his arrest on weapons charges. ((CBC))

"However, she found that the violations weren't sufficient to justify excluding the evidence."

In her judgment, Lytwyn said that allowing the guns as evidence would not negatively impact the administration of justice in the long term.

Society's interest in the adjudication of this case on its merits favours inclusion of the evidence, she said.

Both defendants remain in custody.

Closing arguments in the case are scheduled for Jan. 22.