Surrey councillor Laurie Guerra's private Twitter account called into question

Up until last week, most people could read Surrey councillor Laurie Guerra's tweets.

Now, only 176 followers are privy to the thoughts of a councillor in B.C.'s second-largest city.

Guerra has blocked a number of her criticson Twitter and Facebookand, in an unusual move, made her Twitter account private.

The clampdown came after a newsreportthat Guerra had attended a post-election victory party organized by opponents of SOGI sexual orientation and gender identity a provincial directive that promotes inclusivity in public schools.

Guerra faced backlash onlinefrom parentswho felt her anti-SOGI stance didn't alignwith her role as a board member for the Autism Society of B.C., which advocates for inclusivity.

Now, people are calling out the councillor for concealing her online presence.

The issue underscores a naggingproblem for elected officials: should they be allowed to block members of the public?

"If you're a public person and you are saying statements about public issues, people have a right to see that," said Surrey resident Jodi Murphy, who follows local politicians on Twitter.

It also points to the volatility of social media and balancing the need for public figures to shield themselves from abuse.

Murphy acknowledgedthat politicians are entitled to privacy. But any account that denotes an official's public role in this instance, Guerra's Twitter account identifies her as a Surrey city councillor should be subject to greater oversight, Murphy said.

No case law on the issue

Guerra did not respond to requests for comment. But the City of Surrey said Guerra's Twitter is a personal account and that it doesn't have jurisdiction over personal social media accounts.

Vancouver and Burnaby alsotold CBC News they don't have social media policies for elected officials.

Municipal governments should reconsider that,said Micheal Vonn, policy director of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.

Vonn pointed to a legal battle last month, where Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson wassuedbythreeresidents who accused him of violating their charter rights by blocking them on Twitter.

Watsonargued his Twitter was a personal account. But in the face oflegal battle, Watson concededthat his account was public and settled out of court. He unblocked the users and muted them instead.

While there remains nocase law on the issue,the settlement is a "temperature taking" for future decisions, Vonn said.

"People are alive to this being an issue."

Politiciansface 'brutal tweets'

Blocking users can help stem online abuse and trolling, especially for female politicians.

Women are three times more likely than men to receive sexist comments online, according to astudy this year that compared how male and female politicians are treated on social media.

Three-term Vancouver city councillor Andrea Reimer, who has more than 16,000 followers on Twitter, was vocal about online abuse duringher time in office.

"I had some pretty brutal tweets with words I don't even feel comfortable typing," Reimer said in an email.

"We need to be so much better collectively at calling out trolls for what they are and that includes not allowing them to hijack the communications tools of their intended victims."

More clarity on the issue could soon be found south of the border.

Last May, a court ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump violated the constitutional rights of Twitter users by blocking them. His administration isappealing that decision.