Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

British Columbia

BC Transplant says misunderstanding led to liver transplant human rights case

BC Transplant says a misunderstanding about the guidelines concerningalcohol abstinence and liver transplants triggered a human rights complaint filedearlier this week by a B.C. man who has end-stage liver disease.

Patient filed human rights complaint earlier this week saying alcohol abstinence rule was discriminatory

BC Transplant says a policy requiring patients to abstain from alcohol in order to be eligible for a liver transplant was dropped in the spring. (Fabrizio Bensch/Reuters)

BC Transplant says a misunderstanding about the guidelines concerningalcohol abstinence and liver transplants triggered a human rights complaint filedearlier this week by a B.C. man who has end-stage liver disease.

Ed Ferre, the provincial operations director at BC Transplant,said previousguidelines requiring patients to abstain from alcohol for six months in order to be eligible for a liver transplant were removed in May 2019.

BCTransplant, whichoversees all aspects of organ donation and transplant across B.C.,has contacted the patient, David Dennis, and says atransplant assessment is underway.

Ferreapologized "for any upset caused."

Dennis, who is Carrier SekaniandNuu-chah-nulth,alleged the policy had prevented him from getting on the transplant list as he had not abstained from alcohol in the past six months. He allegedthe policy wasdiscriminatory against Indigenous people who have disproportionately higher rates of alcohol use disorder due "centuries of racist and harmful colonial policies."

Dennis, the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, and the Frank Paul Societyhad filed the human rights complaint againstBC Transplant, the Ministry of Health, and Vancouver Coastal Health on August 11.

Jason Gratl, the lawyer representing Dennis, said his client was "delighted to learn that the [abstinence] policy is no longer in effect."

"If that occurred yesterday or it occurred in the spring, that makes no difference to him," Gratl said.

"The important part to him and to me is that my client is eligible for a liver transplant and that transplants are available in British Columbia on a non-discriminatory basis," hesaid, adding he wants to see a copy of the updated policy before dropping the lawsuit.

Debate led to policy change

Dr.Eric Yoshida, a professor of medicine at the University of British Columbia and a long-time member of the provincial liver transplant program, says there was almost a year of internal debate among B.C.'s medical community leadingto a change in the policy this spring.

The originalpolicywas created through a consensus of transplant programs across Canada, based on research from the 90s.Butnew medical evidence shows that an absolute six-month abstinence rule is not supported, he said, which led to B.C. removing its policy.

The decision to drop the policy meansB.C. is leading the country in this area, he said.

"We were the first transplant program to see patients with HIV and we were leaders for many, many years before any other program finally caught up," Yoshidasaid.

"This is very similar."

In some cases, thereis still value to alcohol abstinence, Yoshida said,since nearlyall patients will improve their liver function by abstaining, but in B.C., there is no strict period of abstinence that patients must adhere to.

"We really haven't refused to see anybody because of the six-month rule."