Ottawa directed RCMP to ban neck restraints, tear gas and rubber bullets. What does it mean for B.C.? - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 10:36 PM | Calgary | 0.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
British Columbia

Ottawa directed RCMP to ban neck restraints, tear gas and rubber bullets. What does it mean for B.C.?

Some B.C. expertssay Ottawa's directive that theRCMP stop using neck restraints, tear gas and rubber bullets should have happened years ago. Others, however, warntaking away some so-called "less-lethal" options may not be the right move.

Public safety minister hopes his RCMP directive will serve as a blueprint for reform in other police services

Police use chemical irritants on protesters in Toronto during the 2010 G20 summit in this file photo. (Darren Calabrese/Canadian Press)

Some B.C. expertssay Ottawa's directive that theRCMP stop using neck restraints, tear gas and rubber bullets should have happened years ago.

Others, however, warntaking away some so-called "less-lethal" options may not be the right move.

Tonye Aganaba, with Vancouver's Black Lives Matter and Defund 604 Network, says such use-of-force techniques areall too common. Aganaba citedrecent police actions in response toprotests byold-growth logging activistson Vancouver Island.

"There was a lot of violence that happened at Fairy Creek," Aganabasaid. "A lot of the same strategies that we're talking about right now were being weaponized."

The Canadian government recently announced it willsoon direct the RCMP to banthe controversial tactics. The move comes after years of increased scrutiny on police conduct, as well as protests critical of policing.

Last month, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino issued a new mandate letter calling on RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to end the police force's use of the techniques. He also called fordeveloping national standards for the use of force.

Vancouver police confirm all three use of force techniques are used by officers in accordance with the B.C. Police Act.

But not everyone is on board with the directive.

Former RCMP officer Alain Babineau, a consultant on public safety and racial profiling issues,toldCBCNews last monthhe questioned the move, and wants to see the evidence on which the government based its decision.

"Now if we start limiting the intervention tools for the police, then we are limiting the options they have," Babineau said. "If firearms become the only option, then it's reasonable to think that things might go very badly at times."

'They can't even be used in war'

Meghan McDermott,with the B.C. Civil LibertiesAssociation, praised the decision. She saidprovincial policing standards need to be updated.

"The B.C. standards also allow for the use of tear gas, which is against international conventions," she said. "They can't even be used in war.

"But for some reason, the B.C. Police Services Division thinks that it's an all-right tactic to be used in some situations."

The new mandate letter also calls for changes torecruitment "to better reflect the communities it serves, in particular Indigenous and Black communities, and recruiting more members with the skills necessary to combat sophisticated crimes."

A demonstrator throws back a police tear gas canister outside the site of the Summit of the Americas in Quebec City in this 2001 file photo. (Kevin Frayer/Canadian Press)

"There is systemic discrimination, there is racism going onand that certain individuals and communities are disproportionately impacted,"McDermott said."They are traumatized."

For Vancouver Black community activist Nova Stevens, the federal government's recommendationaround use-of-force techniques raises concerns, because they will not necessarily makepolice interactions safer.

"They should be the last resort," Stevens said."But if you have to use some sort of weapon, let it be something that's not lethal, that's not going to take a life."

'You cannot remove those tools'

Former B.C. solicitor general Kash Heed, a former Vancouver police officer and one-time chief of West Vancouver Police Department, saidpolice reforms are needed in Canada, but called the recent announcement a "knee-jerk reaction."

Police are trained to use a continuum of force, he says, that can begin with simply being present at a scene andusing verbal communication; the continuum can escalate all the way tothe use of lethal force.

Heed says Ottawa's recent announcement raises the potential for limiting non-lethal techniques.

"You cannot remove those tools from the tool belt of the police officers here in Canada," he said.

Aganaba says in order to better protect communities,non-policing solutions need to be implemented. Those could includeusingmental health experts, for example. There are jurisdictions, such as Oakland, Calif., that have launched crisis intervention services that are independent of policeand can respond to calls for help.

"They'reactually providing things that people need food, water, access to other services, de-escalation,"Aganaba said.

Although the federal government doesn't oversee local forces, Mendicinohopes the directive to RCMP will serve as a blueprint for reform in other police services across the country.

The province says it will review any final direction that is provided by the RCMPcommissioner to determine its impact on B.C.

With files from Janella Hamilton and David Thurton