Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Calgary

Alberta wants equalization reforms as Ottawa aims to lock in formula until 2029

Alberta's UCP government released a position paper Friday calling for a series of reforms tothe equalization formula, arguing the program in its current form hurts wealthy provinces and disincentivizes growth in receiving provinces.

UCP government says other provinces should adopt 'pro-growth' policies so as not to rely on federal transfers

The Alberta legislature, a large domed building, pictured in winter.
The Alberta Legislature is pictured in a file photo. The Alberta government is calling for changes to the federal equalization program, which it calls unsustainable in its current form. (David Bajer/CBC)

Alberta's United Conservative Partygovernment released a position paper Friday calling for a series of reforms tothe equalization formula, arguing that the program in its current form hurts wealthy provinces and disincentivizes growth in receiving ones.

Equalization is a federal program, funded through general revenues, largely sourced from federal taxes, which is used to ensure comparable services across the country.

Earlier this week, the federal Liberal government indicated its plans tolock inthe equalization formula for payments to provinces until 2029 in an omnibus budget motion.

Among the recommendations in the Albertapaperis a recommendation that Canada change the way it measures how provinces raise revenue. It's whatTrevor Tombe,a professor of economics at the University of Calgary, referred to as the paper's "core recommendation."

It would involve a move from the current formula, based on a province's"fiscal capacity,"to one based on the measure of a province'sunderlying economic strength.

"It'ssomething that I think deserves merit in the conversation and could potentially improve the formula in several important ways," Tombe said,addingsuch an approach has a long history, tracing back to the 1950s.

A man looks at the camera.
Trevor Tombe, an economics professor at the University of Calgary, pictured in a file photo. (Colin Hall/CBC)

However, the approach would also come with trade-offs, Tombe said. For example, British Columbia's ability to raise revenue is larger than its economy would suggest because it has a unusually strong property tax base, which is currently measured in the formula.

"So there are trade-offs. Amacro one is simpler, but wouldn't as precisely measure a province's actual ability to raise revenues," he said."So reasonable people can differ on on this proposal, but it's certainly an interesting one."

Tombe saidbeyond seeking to add a macro formula to equalization, the Alberta government is also seeking to dramatically reduce the scale of the program itself. He said that would be a non-starter for any federal government, regardless of party.

Federal government eyeing 2029

In announcing the government's position paper Friday, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith did not hold a press conference, instead releasing a video, calling equalization an unfair "gravy train."

"It's past time we end it," she said.

Ottawa's current plans to lock in the current formula until 2029 harkensback to a series of events in 2018, when itsimilarly passed a 584-page budget implementation bill to extend the formula until 2024.

It drew criticism from provincial officials in Alberta and Saskatchewan, who said they were caught off-guard.

At that point, Joe Ceci, Alberta's finance minister for the then-governing NDP, told reportershe had been communicating his concerns with the program to the federal government for months.

"Frankly, I think that the feds aren't doing as much as they can for provinces like this, who hugely contribute to the wealth of this country," Ceci said at the time.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe also suggested he had been surprised by the move, and then-Alberta Opposition leader JasonKenneycalled it a "slap in the face." Moe has, for years, been proposing that the equalization formula be changed to per-capita.

Contacted by The Canadian Press for comment on the latest plan, Saskatchewan's finance minister said the province had raised concerns about equalization with federal, provincial and territorial finance ministersearlier this year, adding it was "disappointing" the federal government would move ahead with changes without more consultation.

A man with glass and a blue tie speaks to someone across the photo frame.
Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe has been calling for equalization payments to be paid out on a per-capita basis. (Heywood Yu/The Canadian Press)

Debate over equalization often surfaces around election time, and had been a key focus of Kenney's push to secure a "fair deal" for Alberta during his time as premier.

His government went so far as to hold a referendum on equalization payments during Alberta's 2021civic election. Though the province has no power tounilaterally changethe program, Kenney said he believed such a referendum would force the federal government to negotiate in good faith.

That referendum saw 62 per cent of voters support the removal of a Constitutional clause committing Canada to equalization.A few months later, responses to the Confederation for Tomorrow national survey reportsuggested57 per cent of Albertanssupport equalization.

In a statement to CBC,the office of Federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freelandnoted, "equalization ensures that Canadians receive the same quality and level of service, such as health care or education, everywhere across the country."

Adrienne Vaupshas, press secretary to Freeland said, the formula, by law, is reviewed and renewed every five years.

"The federal government regularly speaks with provincial and territorial counterparts about Equalization, and the Deputy Prime Minister did so with all Finance Ministers at their in-person meeting in Toronto in February."

Corrections

  • An earlier version of this story included a definition of equalization that may have led readers to infer that equalization is a provincial transfer, and that it was paid for by taxes by all Canadians.
    May 25, 2023 12:56 PM MT

With files from Rick Donkers and The Canadian Press