Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Calgary

Calgary City Council votes to discuss annexation of small parcel of land in Foothills County

Calgary City Councilvoted Monday night to go ahead with annexation talks with Foothills County over a small piece of land on the city'ssouthern boundary.

Mayor NaheedNenshi argued annexation is waste of time and will take up scarce resources

City council voted Monday to initiate talks with Foothills County on annexing land near the Sirocco Golf Club. (Google Maps)

Calgary City Councilvoted Monday night to go ahead with annexation talks with Foothills County over a small piece of land on the city'ssouthern boundary.

The land, which is located just north of the Sirocco Golf Club, wouldhelp the city boost its land supply,some councillorssay.

"Alarger land supply that we controlis really something that future councils will need to consider," saidCoun.Diane Colley-Urquhart.

City officials say Calgary already has a 30- to 40-year supply of developable land in the south, but Colley-Urquhart says it's better to hold even more land inside the city boundaries.

"We've got to get off this old notion that 30 years of land supply is enough if we really want to have complete communities in the future," she said.

She addedthat there will be no capital costs since roads, utilities and other city services are already planned for surrounding new neighbourhoods.

The land up for annexation is just to the north of the Sirocco Golf Club. (Google Maps)

Mayor disagrees

Mayor NaheedNenshi argued that the annexation is a waste of time.

He said the work will take up scarce resources and that three full-time equivalentemployees would be needed for the project.

"City resources are stretched to the limit. There's so much going on, so many big issues to do and to spend three people's time for a year or more on this little piece just doesn't seem to make sense to me," he said.

Nenshisaidhe thinks the only person whowould benefitis the landowner.

However, council still voted 10-4 to proceed with the annexation work as long as the landowner pays the city's costs.

Even if a deal is reached, it will be years before anything can be built on the landsinceany planwould still require provincial approval.

With files from Scott Dippel