Alberta appeal court sets aside contempt sanctions against pastor, brother and cafe owner

A Calgary-based street pastor, his brother and a cafe owner, all of whom flouted public health restrictions for months, have seen their contempt of court sanctions set aside by the Alberta Court of Appeal.

Pastor Artur Pawlowski of Street Church Ministries, his brotherDawid Pawlowskiand Christopher Scott, who owns the Whistle StopCafein Mirror, Alta.,had been sentenced in October2021 byCourt of Queen's Bench Justice Adam Germain.

They wereconvicted of contempt of courtin June 2021 for breaking COVID-19 health rules a month prior, tied to the enforcement of an injunction granted to Alberta Health Services (AHS).

All three were fined, put on probation and ordered to present the perspective of medical experts if they continued todeliver public speeches that criticizedCOVID-19 public health rules.

On Friday, the appeals court set aside the speech provisions included in all three ordersand set aside the sanctions against Scott and the contempt findings against both Pawlowskis, which resulted in the sanctions also falling.

The appeal court agreed with the argumentthat the order did not apply to thePawlowskis and didn't sufficiently capture what they were doing in May 2021.

Sarah Miller, an associate with JSS Barristerswho represented the brothers, said though the Pawlowskis can be "somewhat abrasive" at times, she argued that the Court of Queen's Bench justice made the decision based on a disagreement with what the Pawlowskis were doing.

"Rather than the proper legal analysis as to, does the order apply, and if so, what is an appropriate sanction?" Miller said.

"They're not by any means endorsing the Pawlowskis, that's not what we were asking for. But they have concluded that AHSdid not obtain an order that applied to the Pawlowskis."

The Pawlowski brothers had appealed the contempt findings and the sanctions, while Scott appealed only the sanctions.

At the time of sentencing, Germain had said the trio was "on the wrong side of science" and the "wrong side of common sense," and that all three had "encouraged others to doubt the legitimacy of the pandemic."

The panel also ordered that the finesand coststhePawlowskis paid be reimbursed, and that the Pawlowskis' costs for the lower court proceedings and the appealbe paid by AHS to the brothers. Miller said those costs are expected to exceed $30,000.

Pandemic orders

The Pawlowskis had held large, maskless gatherings for church events in Calgary throughout the pandemic. The Whistle Stop Cafe similarly operated for months in defiance of public health orders.

This incident was hardly the first timeArtur Pawlowskifaced legal trouble amid the pandemic.At times, he was arrested within days of his release on other charges.

WATCH | Calgary street preacher, brother taken into custody:

Calgary street preacher, brother taken into custody

3 years ago

Duration 0:37

Artur and Dawid Pawlowski were arrested May 8 after flouting public health restrictions for months by holding large church gatherings indoors, without masks, in Calgary despite the pandemic. (Video: Artur Pawlowski TV/YouTube)

In January, the brotherswere arrested after a protest outside the health minister's house in Calgary. Artur was lateraccused of inciting violence during theblockade atthe Coutts, Alta., border crossing.

Scott, the cafe owner, argued in his appeal that the sanctions applied to him were excessive and disproportionate and violated his rights under the charter. He also argued the speech provisions were not requested by AHS, to which the court agreed.

The panel said it agreed those provisions should be set aside, writing that a judge sanctioning for civil contempt, like a sentencing judge, "should alert counsel before imposing a sanction that exceeds or is significantly different from that sought by the other party and afford counsel the opportunity to address the proposed sanction."

It went on to say that Scott's three days spent in jail, coupled with other sanctions, was sufficient to reflect the seriousness of his breach of the injunction. It set a fine of $10,000 and eight months probation, already served, as new sanctions.