Eau Claire smokestack heritage designation to be debated by Calgary city council - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 19, 2024, 02:57 PM | Calgary | -4.8°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

Eau Claire smokestack heritage designation to be debated by Calgary city council

City council is set to discuss Monday whether to remove the heritage designation for a Calgary landmark.

Developer seeking to remove heritage designation for 27-metre brick structure so it can be moved

Harvard Property Management says the smokestack will have interpretive features at its new location about 150 metres away. (City of Calgary)

City council is set to discuss Monday whether to remove the heritage designation for a Calgary landmark.

The Eau Claire smokestack must be moved to make way for a redevelopment of the nearby Eau Claire market.

The 27-metre-tall brick landmark has stood there since 1947, a remnant of an old city transit garage that was located where the market sits today.

The owner of the site wants city council to remove its heritage designation so the structure can be dismantled and moved a short distance away, making way for redevelopment of the site.

Coun. Druh Farrell says she's opposed to removing the designation because it will set a precedent.

Calgary's Eau Claire smokestack is one of only two original structures left in that area. (Eric Vondran)

"We don't have a great history of preserving heritage in Calgary and when you've got something that has the highest designation in the land, it should mean something," she said.

Along with a promise to rebuild the smokestack and add an improved interpretation of its history, the property owner intends to also make a $300,000 payment to the city for its heritage programs.

Still, Farrell says she voted against the de-designation on first reading and she intends to do the same this week.

"This was a very upsetting day when council agreed to de-designate and I voted against that and I'll continue to vote against it, because it erodes the whole meaning of designation," she said.

With files from Scott Dippel