Calgary council adds 2 skeptics to Olympic subcommittee after concerns over 'optics' - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 04:07 AM | Calgary | -1.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

Calgary council adds 2 skeptics to Olympic subcommittee after concerns over 'optics'

Calgary city council voted Wednesday to expand the membership of its new Olympic oversight subcommittee, after criticism the group was dominated by bid supporters.

Concerns had been raised committee was dominated by pro-bid members

A young girl learns to skate on the ice at the 1988 Calgary Olympic Plaza on a warm day in Calgary in 2014. (Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press)

Calgary city council voted Wednesday to expand the membership of its new Olympic oversight subcommittee, after criticismthe group was dominated by bid supporters.

On Monday, council voted in a closed door meeting to create thefive-person subcommittee to focus on issues pertaining to a potential Calgary bid forthe 2026 Winter Olympic Games.

Out of the five members elected Monday Mayor Naheed Nenshi and Couns. Evan Woolley, Ray Jones, Diane Colley-Urquhart and Demong only Demonghas consistently opposed the idea of Calgary as a host city for the games.

Magliocca, Farrell added to committee

Council voted to expand the membership to seven on Wednesday adding Couns. Joe Magliocca and Druh Farrell to the group.

Both Magliocca and Farrell are skeptics of a potential bid.

"I'm hoping that now we can put a certain amount of diversions behind us and actually focus on the job at hand, which is deciding whether this Olympics should go forward or not in a thoughtful, cohesive manner,"Coun. PeterDemongsaid Wednesday.

Farrell had expressed her frustration on Twitterthat she wasn't initially appointed to the committeeon Tuesday, writing, "Pretty hard to get balance on the committee when the critic who was willing to serve wasn't appointed."

Demongsaidhe was concerned about the "optics" of the committee's initial makeup.

"When you have a single person with one viewpoint and the balance of the committee with a different viewpoint, the optics don't look good," he said.

"So if we can now have what would seem to be a balanced committee going forward, I think the public would be more comfortable that the issues are being discussed in a balanced, transparent and neutral manner. That's a good thing."

With files from Scott Dippel