Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Calgary

Calgary secondary suites scoreboard: 21 approved, 5 rejected in marathon council meeting

City council has ploughed through all 26 secondary suite applications before it on Monday. All but five were rejected.

Mayor thinks time-consuming and 'silly' process needs to change, Coun. Andre Chabot likes it as is

Coun. Andre Chabot (left) believes the current process for secondary suite applications gives all affected residents a fair chance to have their perspectives heard before council makes a decision. Mayor Naheed Nenshi, however, sees the time-consuming process as 'silly.' (CBC)

Calgary city council had to face down 26 secondary suite applications on Monday and voted in favour of 21.

A graphic representing the number of individual land-use rezoning applications for secondary suites approved and rejected at a Calgary city council meeting in 2016. Two years later, council approved blanket zoning changes so these types of applications were no longer necessary.
(CBC)

Mayor Naheed Nenshi made no bones about his distaste for the painstaking process, which sees him and Calgary's 14 city councillors deliberate and vote on each application, one by one.

This unusual process for a city of Calgary's size requires hours of time froma council that is among the most highly compensated in the country.

The mayor earnsmore than$216,000 in annualsalary, andcouncillorsearn more than $115,000 each.

Council members don't get paid overtime but many city staff members do, and ithas been estimated that comes with about $10,000 in additional costs for an extra four hours.

It also requires members of the public to sit and wait, often for hours sometimes days for their chance to speak in favouror against a given application.

"People get to take a day or two days off work to come down and ask to be able to do something with their own property," the mayor said.

"The whole thing is really kind of silly."

But Coun. Andre Chabot sees it differently.

He bristled at the suggestion of changing the process for secondary suites, specifically, just because they are relatively small projects, notingother types of land-use amendments are handled directly by council.

"I think everyone should be offered the same opportunity to speak in favour of their project or in opposition to a particular project," he said.

"I don't think the scale of the project should be what regulates whether this process is applied. My opinion is that it should be all or none, and I think it's a great process."

with files from Bryan Labby