Canmore lawyer wins appeal for court review of controversial rezoning - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 03:59 PM | Calgary | -10.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

Canmore lawyer wins appeal for court review of controversial rezoning

A lawyer in Canmore has won an appeal for a court to review a rezoning the Peaks of Grassi section of the Three Sisters Mountain Resort.

Arguments can now be made against plans to develop part of Peaks of Grassi

Lawyer Mark Gruman, who lives in the Peaks of Grassi area, will now be able to make arguments against the town's decision to rezone part of his neighbourhood for further development. (Bryan Labby/CBC)

A lawyer in Canmore has won an appeal to have a court review a decision to rezone part of thePeaks of Grassi section of the Three Sisters Mountain Resort.

The land, which had been set aside as an urban reserve,was one of three parcels protected in 1992 as part of an agreement between the town and the original developer in the area.

Canmore's town council voted earlier this year to rezone the land for development.

Lawyer and arearesident Mark Gruman initially brought the matter to court, which continued through to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

This latest decision means he can make several arguments against the rezoning.

"We're free now to argue all of the grounds that we felt justified the judicial review to quash the bylaw which, under Justice Rawlins' decision, we had been prevented from doing except on one ground."

Gruman says the town council's decision to develop the land was not supported by proper evidence, and that theneighbourhood wants the bylaw set aside and for the town to look at it properly.
The trees on the left would be removed if a planned expansion of the Peaks of Grassi section of the Three Sisters Mountain Resort goes ahead. (Bryan Labby/CBC)

"Basically what we're asking the council to do is to make a decision that this land is properly suitable for development, which we say they should be doing before they make a decision as to what's to be built there.

"And we say they basically have made an error, they haven't made a decision whether the lands are properly suitable for development and have jumped to what's to be developed."

The judicial appeal will be held early next month.