Town of Canmore granted right to appeal order by provincial tribunal on major developments - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 11, 2024, 06:34 AM | Calgary | -1.6°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Calgary

Town of Canmore granted right to appeal order by provincial tribunal on major developments

Alberta's highest court has granted permission for a mountain community west of Calgary to appeal a decision by a provincial tribunal ordering it to allow two major developments that could almost double the town's population.

Land and Property Rights Tribunal ordered town to allow 2 projects in May

The proposed area structure plan for Three Sisters Mountain Village in Canmore will include a requirement that 20 per cent of future development fit the town's affordable housing requirements. The plan will debated again on May 11, 2021.
Combined, the proposed developments would cover more than 300 hectares of land and feature residential, recreational and commercial uses. (Bryan Labby/CBC)

Alberta's highest court has granted permission for a mountain community west of Calgary to appeal a decision by a provincial tribunal ordering it to allow two major developments that could almost double the town's population.

Canmore town council had rejected the proposed Three Sisters Village and Smith Creek projects, but the Land and Property Rights Tribunal of Alberta ruled in May that both developments could go ahead.

The town then applied for permission to appeal that decision to the Court of Appeal of Alberta.

Justice Jolaine Antonio has ruled that the town can proceed with its appeal on questions of law and jurisdiction.

The two proposals on Canmore's eastern edge include about 80 per cent of the town's remaining developable land and raised concerns about affordable housing and wildlife.

The decisions by the tribunal, however, found both developments met the parameters set out in a 1992 review of the Three Sisters area by the Natural Resources Conservation Board.

Antonio says the town's concerns are of sufficient importance to merit a further appeal.

"The town's proposed grounds of appeal are interrelated and pertain to the scope of the town's involvement and ability to apply its own processes in considering applications for projects within its boundaries," she wrote in the decision Tuesday.

"These issues are compounded by the evolution of the legal landscape surrounding project development in the 30 years since the NRCB approval."

A public hearing on the two developments last year took seven days and heard from more than 200 people concerned about possible effects on the busy town and wildlife in the area.