Alberta Court of Appeal reserves decision on whether to grant new trial for triple murderer Douglas Garland

Douglas Garland, who killed a five-year-old Calgary boy and his grandparents, must wait to learn whether he'll get a new trial after Alberta's highest court reserved its decision on whether to overturn the three first-degree murder convictions.

Garland was convicted in February 2017 and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 75 years for the gruesome murders ofNathan O'Brien, 5, and his grandparents, Alvin and Kathy Liknes.

Garland, 59, also appealed his sentence, but only the conviction appeal arguments were made on Thursday.

Much of the evidence against Garland came from the farm where he lived with his parents that evidence included DNA from all three victims found on various items including a hacksaw and meat hook.

On Thursday, defence lawyer Alias Sanders argued that the trial judge, Justice David Gates, erred when he allowed evidence gathered from the farm to be presented to jurors.

• The never-before-heard details of the Douglas Garland investigation from lead detective

On July 4, 2014, after police were pointed in Garland's direction by his sister and brother-in-lawthe lead detective directed a search of the farm, even though police did not have a warrant, believingthe family members could still be alive.

"It's a laudable goal but doesn't conform with the constitutional rights of the accused," said Sanders.

While the law allows for searches under"exigent circumstances," Sanders argued the police did not have strong enough evidence linking Garland and the farm to the missing family.

Police had information suggesting Garland's truck was similar to the one spotted near the Liknes home the night of the killings. They also knew Garland held a grudge against Alvin Liknes. But, Sanders argued, those two pieces of information would not have justified a search warrant.

Sanders also argued the trial judge, Justice David Gates, overemphasized the graphic nature of the evidence, which she said wasprejudicial to the defence's case and undermined the presumption of innocence.

In June 2014, Nathan O'Brien was having an impromptusleepover at his grandparents' home.

The three family members were taken from the Liknes's home on June 29, 2014, and, according to the trial prosecutors, werekilled on thefarmnorth of Calgary where Garland lived with his parents.

He then burned thebodies.Pieces of teeth and bone were found in a burn pile on the property, which took investigators months to sift through.

Aerial photos that happened tocapture the Garland property on July 1, 2014, around 9:30 a.m.byadigital mapping company showed what appeared to be three bodies two larger and one smaller laid out on the farm near some outbuildings.

During the trial, jurors heard evidence Garland was motivated by a grudge over a business relationship with Alvin Liknesthat had soured years before.

Prosecutors Christine Rideout and Sarah Clive argued Garland's convictions should stand. They said Gates'scomments about graphic evidence were"in keeping with his duty as a trial judge" and that the trial judge properly allowed evidence from the farm to go before the jury.

Rideout mentionedGarland had brought up his grudge against Alvin Liknes as recently as the week before the killings. The prosecutor also pointed out that the then-suspect'ssister had married Liknes's son.

"Clearly [Garland] had a connection to the missing family," said Rideout.