Alberta's top court supports consecutive sentences for 3 triple murderers

Alberta's top court has supported consecutive sentences for three triple murderers, including a man who killed a Calgary couple and their grandson and a central Albertan who killed his parents and sister with a friend.

The Alberta Court of Appeal upheld a life sentence with no chance of parole for 75 years forDouglas Garland, who killed five-year-old Nathan O'Brien and his grandparents, Alvin and Kathy Liknes,in Calgary in 2014.

Garlandunsuccessfully appealed his75-year-parole ineligibility, imposed by the trial judge as consecutiverather than concurrentsentences.

The court also ruled Monday on a second case involving Jason Klaus and Joshua Frank, who killed Klaus's parents, Gordon and Sandra Klaus, and his sister, Monica Klaus,in 2013 at the victims' home on a farm near Castor, about 140 kilometres east of Red Deer.

The two men were given life sentences but the trial judge imposed concurrent parole ineligibilities, meaning the killers could apply for parole in 25 years.

On Monday, the majority of the Alberta Court of Appeal panel allowed the appeal, finding the trial judge's sentence "disproportionate and unfit."

The higher court hasimposed a 50-year parole ineligibility, with the men to serve their sentences for Monica Klaus's killing consecutive to the parents.

• Crime 'cheaper by the dozen': Crown says in arguing triple murderers should spend minimum 75 years in prison

One judge dissented

Justice Frans Slatteroffered a dissenting opinion on both cases. In both cases, Slatter questionedwhether Parliamentintended consecutive periods of parole ineligibility to be imposedwhen an accused issimultaneously convicted of more than one murder.

Slatter also took issue with the parole ineligibility incrementsof25, 50or 75 years, calling the choice a "blunt instrument."

"It prevents a sentencing judge from carefully balancing the many factors that go into achieving a proportional and individualized sentence," wrote Slatter in his dissent.

"An alternative solution to the identified problem of 'volume discounts'for multiple murders would be to permit sentencing judges to incrementally increase the period of parole ineligibility in those cases, to some fixed limit."

Boy,grandparents killed

ACalgary jury foundGarland guilty in 2017 of the first-degree murders ofO'Brien and the Likneses.

On June 29, 2014, Nathan had been at his grandparents for asleepover. When the boy's mother arrived to pick him up, all three family members were gone and the home was covered in blood.

In its appeal, the prosecution argued Garland's sentence shouldreflect his decision to kill the child witness rather than leave him.

• The never-before-heard details of the Douglas Garland investigation from lead detective

The three family members were attacked at the home before Garland took them in his pickup truck to his parent'sfarm nearAirdrie. There, he disposed of the bodies.

Bone fragments, flesh and teeth were found in a burn pit on the property. A chance fly-by by an aerialmapping plane showed the three bodies laid out on the farm.

At trial, the Crown presented evidence that Garland was angry with Alvin Liknes over a dispute regarding a patent for an oilfield pump the two had worked on together. Prosecutors argued this hostility built up to the point where Garland meticulously plotted the killings.

Killers confess to police

Klaus and Frankwerefound guilty on three counts offirst-degree murder in the 2013 shooting deaths of Gordon, Sandra and Monica Klausat the victims' home on a farm near Castor.

The killers set the houseon fire afterward.

Klaus was set to inherit the family farm after the deaths. Evidence presented at trial showed he had cocaine and gambling addictions and was in financial trouble.

Klaus becameworried his parents would find out he hadbeen stealing money from them and forging cheques, and offered Frank money to help kill his family.

Crime 'cheaper by the dozen': Crown

Both men confessed to police during an undercover operation.

Those killers will be able to apply for parole after 25 years.

In arguing Klaus and Frank's sentence appeal, prosecutor IwonaKuklicz said the killerswere handed a sentence that sent a message their crimes were "cheaper by the dozen."

Kuklicz asked the panel of judges to impose a 75-year-term before the two could apply for parole.

Regardless, lawyersin both cases say they expect to seek leave to appeal from the country's top court.

Klaus's lawyer, Michael Bates, as well as Frank's lawyer, Andrea Urquhart, both say they are awaiting instructions from their clients but expect to be asking the Supreme Court of Canada to hear the case.

Kim Ross, one of Garland's lawyers,says he is reviewing the decision and also anticipates taking the sentence appeal to the Supreme Court.

In November, in a unanimous decision, Quebec's Court of Appeal reducedAlexandre Bissonnette'slife sentence to 25 years without parole while at the same time invalidating sections of the Criminal Code that allow judges to hand out consecutive life sentences for murder.

Bissonnette killed six people in a Quebec City mosque in 2017. The Appeal Court ruled his life sentence with no chance of parole for 40 years amounted to"cruel and unusual" punishment.

It is possible the Supreme Court of Canada could hear the Bissonnette and Alberta cases together.