Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Calgary

Suncor hostile takeover bid of Canadian Oil Sands in front of Alberta regulator

The Alberta Securities Commission will hear arguments today into whether Canadian Oil Sands should be allowed to keep its defence against hostile takeovers.

COS to make its case to Alberta Securities Commission as it fends off acquisition attempt

A worker communicates with another via radio at Syncrude's Mildred Lake Upgrader, part of The Syncrude Project complex for oil sands processing in Fort McMurray. Both Canadian Oil Sands and Suncor have stakes in the project. (Norm Betts/Bloomberg News)

The Alberta Securities Commission will hear arguments today into whether Canadian Oil Sands should be allowed to keep its defence against hostile takeovers.

Suncor Energy took a $4.5-billion all-stock offer directly to shareholders on Oct. 5 after attempts at inking a friendly deal were rebuffed by COS leadership in the spring.

In response, COS enacted a new shareholder rights plan also known as a poison pill defence designed to buy it more time to find alternatives to Suncor's offer.

A takeover bid must be open for 120 days in order for it not to trigger the poison pill.

Suncor's 60-day offer expires on Dec. 4.

Suncor argues the shareholder rights plan should be struck down and that COS shareholders should have the opportunity to decide for themselves whether to take the deal.

An affidavit filed to the securities commission says several other parties have been scoping out a deal with COS.

RBC Capital Markets' Jamie Anderson, who is advising COS, said in the filing that 25 parties are kicking the tires and four "highly credible" ones have signed confidentiality agreements.

"I firmly believe that with more time to run our process, there is a good prospect for one or more counterparties to make a proposal," Anderson said in the affidavit.

"In my opinion, a 60-day period to canvas the range of parties interested in the COS opportunity, to permit them to undergo due diligence and to negotiate an alternative transaction is simply insufficient in these circumstances. I firmly believe 120 days is a more realistic time period."

'Opportunistic and Exploitive'

COS has derided the Suncor offer as too low, opportunistic and exploitive.

"If Suncor had confidence in the merits of its bid, it wouldn't be trying to ram it through by challenging our shareholder rights plan. It would not need to try to steal time for a decision from our shareholders," CEO Ryan Kubik said earlier this month.

Suncor has warned COS shareholders that failing to accept its offer is a risky proposition, given the likelihood of a prolonged downturn in oil prices. Suncor has described its offer as "full and fair" and has signalled it won't be sweetening the deal.

"We are asking the ASC to strike down the new rights plan so that COS shareholders can decide for themselves and in a timely fashion whether to tender their shares to our full and fair offer," Suncor CEO Steve Williams said in a news release earlier this month.

"COS has had more than enough time to identify and present to shareholders any value enhancement alternatives that may exist. ... We believe this new COS rights plan is an inappropriate defensive tactic that runs counter to the best interests of COS shareholders."

Both companies are partners in the Syncrude oilsands project north of Fort McMurray, Alta. COS has a 37 per cent stake, which is its main asset. Suncor has a 12 per cent share of Syncrude and has vast oilsands operations in northeastern Alberta.