Report calls for Alberta to put a time limit on inactive oil and gas wells

Inactive oil and gas wells remain an intractable problem in Alberta, but a report released this week suggests the solution is probably not that complicated. Alberta could simply follow in the steps of Texas and North Dakota and impose a time limit on how long a well can sit idle.

The provinceis sprinkled with old wells, more than 150,000 in varying degrees of decline.

Some have been orphaned, meaning their owners are out of business and can'tclean up the problem;tens of thousands more have been abandoned and plugged with concrete, but not fully reclaimed;and 82,546 are inactive, meaning no more oil or natural gas is being produced, butthe wells haven't been plugged and could, at least theoretically, be brought back to life.

Tony Bruder has one such well on his land. It's been sitting inactive since his grandparents owned the land in the 1950s. The owner of the well has changed multiple times, but has never been motivated to clean it up, in part because there are no time limits in Alberta as to how long a well can sit dormant.

• Bankrupt energy firms add to Alberta's abandoned well problems

• Alberta Energy Regulator tries to stem tide of orphan wells

It is often more economical to continue to pay lease rates to a landowner than to pay to plug and reclaima well, the cost of which can be tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars.

It seems obvious that the well onBruder's landis never going back into production, but how many other wells in Albertaare in the same situation?

Higher oil prices not the answer

An economist at the University of Calgary has produced a report that triesto calculate what it would take to get those wells back to work. LucijaMuehlenbachsfound that even ifoil prices were to increase by 200 per cent, only 12 per cent of the inactive wells would be brought back into production.

• Alberta looks at different ways of making sure companies clean up old wells

• Canada's oilpatch needs new customers. Who's willing to buy?

"They're allowed to be inactive because you don't want to cut off theproductivelifeofthesewells," said Muehlenbachs. "In caseprices go up or in case technology changes,somethingthatallows them to bereactivated."

But she found that"prices could skyrocket or recovery rates could increase and still we don't see a lot of them being reactivated."

Tighter timelines in U.S.

Across the border in the United States, there are no jurisdictions that allow inactive wells to sit indefinitely. InTexas, the limitis six months, although companies can apply for unlimited extensions. In North Dakota, which does not have an abandoned well problem, the limitis 12 months and companies can apply for just one extension of up to two years.

"We've got to get to, as other jurisdictions have, a regulated timeline," said Barry Robinson, a lawyer with EcoJustice, who represents landowners likeBruder.

• Tougher Alberta rules convince oil and gas producers to accelerate well cleanups

• With Alberta still in a slump, some oil industry players have an idea to get people back to work

"If yourwell doesn't do anything for five years, you have to abandon it and reclaim it. It's especially irking that after abandonment, there's no reason not to reclaim immediately. You're not coming back, the well is gone, you might as well be reclaiming in a year or two."

Muehlenbachs agrees. "The reasoning behind leaving a well inactive, if it is to allow for recovery in the future, the study shows that's probably not going to happen."

Inactive wells are regulated by the Alberta Energy Regulator. However, in a statement, the AER said that time limits are not under its control, but are the responsibility of the provincial government.