How the Port Fuels waterfront garbage plant got 'fast-tracked'

Lower city councillors and other opponents ofa proposed waste "gasification" plant on the waterfront are calling this week for the provincial Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change to "bump up" its review of the project's environmental impacts.

But a local environmental expert says those requests are rarely granted.

And while the plant's opponentscontendthe developerspulled a fast oneby submitting the projectfor the less stringent environmental screening, the company hasfollowedprovincial laws and qualifies for the easier reviewbecause of the energy producing part of the project.

Defined as waste facility

The city this week deemed the project,first and foremost,a waste processing plant that happens to produce energy. That's rather than deeming itmostly anenergy-from-wastefacility. That difference in definition meansthe city can'thold the project back based on its zoning rules.

But the fact that it produces energy from wasteat allmeans the project qualifiesfor a less intensive process in pursuing its environmental OK from the province.

• What's next for Hamilton waterfront garbage plant proposal
• Ward councillor will ask council to formally oppose gas plant
• City can't use zoning to block port lands gasification plant

"There's never been an issue in my mind or misinterpretation in my mind," Port Fuels COO Robert Clark told CBC Hamilton this week. "The definitions from the province and the definitions from the municipality have been laid out and interpreted correctly for some time."

Lynda Lukasic, head of Environment Hamilton, said the province's environmental assessment laws have been "substantially weakened" in recent years.

"Sadly, under provincial rules, the energy generation gives them the pass on the full [environmental assessment]," she said.

Bump-ups rare

There are two main processes involved in the proposed plant, andLukasicargues one of them, direct plasma, which has no energy component,should havetriggered the fuller review. She wrote a letter to the ministry in January outlining her case for that.

Lukasic acknowledged the calls for "bump up" or elevation requests, but said "this rarely if ever happens."

At issue is the way the company pursued environmental compliancefrom the province. The plant is expected to generate some energy from the processing of industrial waste, and because of that energy production, it qualifies under provincial rules for an "energy from waste" plant. That allowed it to go about pursuing provincial OK by filing an environmental screening report, rather than undergoing a more stringent Individual environmental assessment.

Both processes involve making applications and filings to the ministry, but the second one would involve more provincial scrutiny of the operations and impacts.

Kate Jordan, spokeswoman for the Ministry of Environment, said Wednesday the agency is evaluating Port Fuels' application and has asked for supplementary materials.

She said the ministry is also evaluating previous requests it has received for the project to undergo the "bump up" assessment process. Clark said he's confident the company is prepared should the request for the higher level ofscrutinybe granted.

Jordan said the ministry received three "bump-up" requests in2013-2014 planned under the same screening process as the Port Fuels facility. One project withdrew its application and wasn't built, one was for an increase in the amount of waste to be processed at an existing animal crematorium and the third was to expand an already approved landfill.

"In every case, the ministry carefully considered the requests and did a fulsome review of the concerns expressed," Jordan said. "Ultimately, the ministry found the proposals met the requirements of the screening process and further environmental assessment was not required."