Spy watchdog to investigate CSIS visit to Hamilton man's home
Ken Stone says CSIS visit was meant to 'intimidate' him, wants an apology
The watchdog agency that oversees the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) says it will review the complaint of a Hamilton man who allegesagents visited his house to intimidate him.
The Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC), the five-person board of political appointees that examines CSISs operations, has tapped chair Chuck Strahl to investigate the claimput by longtime activist Ken Stone.
In July, Stone made a formal complaint to SIRC about a Jan. 25 visit by CSIS agents to his Mountain home.
In his letter to SIRC, the 67-year-old alleges that the visit was intended to intimidate me and members of my family from lawfully exercising our Charter rights to freedom of expression and association and, counter to CSISs mandate, did not address a meaningful security threat.
The visit, he wrote, caused me and my family a considerable amount of anxiety. He has asked for a formal apology from CSIS as well as statement from SIRC demanding that CSIS cease and desist from home and workplace visits to residents of Canada that are designed to intimidate residents of Canada from exercising their Charter rights.
Last week, Stone received a letter stating that SIRCwill holdhearings into the case, but a date for the proceedings has not been set.
Stonesaid he plans to attend the hearingsin Ottawa, and will retain a lawyer to help him make his case.
Both 'pleased' and 'disappointed'
Stonesaid hes pleased the committee has chosen to take on his case, but he is doubtful that the process will yield the answers he seeks.
On the one hand, Im pleased that they have taken up the complaint because they had the discretion not to take up the complaint. The fact that they choseto take it up is a good sign, he said.
However, Stone said hes disappointed thatStrahl, a former Conservative MP and federal cabinet minister, has been assigned to investigate the case.
Hes a Conservative Party hack and I dont expect a lot of sympathy from him.
That Strahl and his fellow SIRC members are political appointees shows a fundamental problem with oversight over CSIS, Stone added.
Committee members, he said, would put their jobs at risk if they slammed the governments policies, and neitherCSISnor Parliament are required to adoptSIRCsrecommendations.
Contacted by CBC Hamilton on Thursday,SIRCsaid it would not be able to respond to Stone's criticism. But in an interview with CBC Hamilton in March,SIRCsenior counsel SylvieRousseldefended the committee's integrity.
"We have a process and we follow that process," she said, noting that panel members"take their role very seriously."
'Canadians deserve better'
Jean Paul Duval, a spokesmanwith Public Safety Canada, said the ministry does not comment on specific cases.
However, in an email statement to CBC Hamilton,defendedSIRC's review process.
"SIRC is at arms length from the Government and provides independent review that CSIS activities comply with law and Ministerial Direction," he wrote.
When Stone first went public about the CSIS visit in the winter, he initially said he would not go through with making a complaint to SIRC, figuring it would be futile exercise. He later decided he wanted to his grievance on record, regardless of the outcome.
On Thursday, Stone said he hopes the government will eventually adopt an civilian oversight body akin to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission that is independent and not led bypolitical appointees.
"All in all, its not a satisfactory oversight process, Stone said. Canadians deserve better."
_(720p).jpg)
 OFFICIAL HD MUSIC VIDEO.jpg)
.jpg)
