Political theatre bleeds into Mountain LRT information session

City LRT guru Paul Johnson faced an onslaught of questions about the project at Wednesday night's public information session on the Mountainexcept this time, many of them were from two citycouncillors.

For most of the other sessions across the city,councillorstook a more hands off approach, leaving staff members to answer questions about the LRT project and gather input from residents one on one.

But at Wednesday night's session at theSackvilleHill Senior's Recreation Centre, Ward 7Coun. DonnaSkellyand Ward 8Coun. Terry Whitehead were a focal point.

I'd support this if we had a big attraction to downtown, like a casino.-SarahWarry-Poljanski, Mountain resident

Instead of an informal open house session, Johnson took questions from a crowd of about 50 people all at once, including several questions from the twocouncillorswho weren't shy about using the event to expresstheir vocal opinions against the project.

"We're not ready, we don't have the ridership,we're years and years away from this,"Skellytold the crowd.

"In the end, everyone here is going to pay for this."

Whitehead heralded bus rapid transit as the superior option to LRT to the crowd, and brought up his own 58-page LRT report, which was released in July to decidedly mixed reviews.

Public 'subjected to political gamesmanship,' lower city councillor says

Johnson, who is the city's LRT projectco-ordinator, told CBC News that this was the first time one of these sessions was held this way. He also said he didn't take issue with the waySkellyand Whitehead were involved in the discussion.

"[Thecouncillors] were clear to the public that there is a political side to this, and that is their business," he said.

Ward 4Coun. SamMerulla, who did not attend the LRT information session in his ward, said these meetings should be "free of political interference."

"It skews the entire process," saidMerulla, who supports the LRT project. "This is a night for the public to ask questions,not to be subjected to political gamesmanship."

The Mountain has typically been associated withsome of the most vocal criticism of the LRT project, but Johnson said the comments and questions he took were "consistent" with the other sessions.

That means some people ardently for the project, somecompletelyagainst, and lots in the middle asking questions.

SarahWarry-Poljanskiwas against the idea, saying that Hamilton should be putting more transit options in areas that are "underserved" like the Mountain and rural Hamilton.

"I don't want to fund something that I can't use," she said, citing how difficult it is to use public transit from the Mountain to get to the lower city.

"I'd support this if we had a big attraction to downtown, like a casino," she said, channeling another of Hamilton's biggest debates in the last few years.

City says connections to the Mountain would be built under BLAST network

Mohawk college student Nathaniel Booth was also against the project. "It would make more sense to start with a line that connects the Mountain to downtown," he said.

The city says those connections would eventually be built. The current LRT A and B line plans are part of a larger planned rapid transit system called the BLAST network, which would eventually see rapid transit lines extending across the Mountain, to the airport and out toWaterdown.

Fellow Mohawk student EricBentzen, meanwhile, was all for LRT. "I used to go toMcMaster, and I'd take transit all the time, so I know how crazy it can be," he said. "It's needed."

Plans for the $1 billion LRT project have trains running alternately on Main and King fromMcMasterUniversity to theQueenstontraffic circle, and down James Street North from King Street to the West Harbour GO station. Construction is due to start in 2019.

The last of the city's information sessions on the project is scheduled for Thursday night from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. atDundasTown Hall at 60 Main St.

adam.carter@cbc.ca