Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Kitchener-Waterloo

Cat faces hard to read except by 'cat whisperers', research finds

A study at the University of Guelph has looked into the faces of cats, and found that people - including cat lovers - can have a hard time discerning whether a cat is happy or sad simply by looking at its face.

'Being a cat lover is not enough,' researcher Georgia Mason learned

"Cats are quite hard to read," said Georgia Mason, a behavioural biologist whose recently published paper digs into theage-old question: What is my cat thinking? (City of St. John's)

Science has confirmed what many pet owners alreadyknow.

"Cats are quite hard to read," said Georgia Mason, a behavioural biologist whose recently published paper digs into theage-old question: What is my cat thinking?

"Cats are a bit overlooked and underappreciated," she said.

"We thought maybe it's because they are a bit tougher to read,so let's see what's going on with their faces."

Mason and her colleagues at the University of Guelph foundabundant research material among the uncounted thousands of catvideos on YouTube.

They chose videos in which it was clear whether the cat washaving a positive or negative experience -- if it was advancing toits human, for example, or being blocked from something by a closeddoor. They edited each video down to a few seconds and croppedalmost everything else out except for the cat's face.

"It was hard to find videos that met our strict criteria."

They eventually produced a list of 20 video clips. Mason's owncats, Sylvie and Luke, both made the cut.

'Amazing' response

Then came the easy part. The team put the clips on the Internet,with a question beneath asking if the cat was happy, unhappy, orsimply inscrutable.

"We got 11,000 responses in 10 days," Mason laughs. "It wasamazing."

'What am I thinking?' University of Guelph survey studies how well humans can read the faces of cats. (David W Cerny/Reuters)

Most were from Canada, but 85 countries were represented.

In the end, 6,300 responses were analyzed. The average score was less than 12 out of 20 -- not much better than chance.

Surprisingly, or maybe not surprisingly, loving cats made nostatistical difference.

"I went into this pretty sure I was going to be great," Masonsaid. "But being a cat lover is not enough."

Tend to be young women

There were, however, a select few -- about 13 per cent -- whoconsistently scored upwards of 15 out of 20. They tended to be either female, young, or both -- or were professional veterinarians.

Mason theorizes that women, for whatever reason, tend to be better at reading facial expressions. Vets simply see a lot of catsand learn to figure them out.

Apart from its intrinsic interest, the work is part of a rapidlygrowing field of research into animal emotion and how that is
expressed, Mason said. It may help out cats as well.

Cats are almost as popular as dogs as household pets. Owners,however, seem less attached to them.

Mason points out that animal shelters report people are much morelikely to turn in a cat than a dog. Cats are harder to adopt, too.

Maybe that's because we don't understand them as well.

"Dogs are easy to read," said Mason. "We've selected them to be easy to read.

"Cats haven't been domesticated as long. In some ways, they are less domesticated."

As a result, she suggests, "People just get rid of their catsmore easily."

To help create a more canine bond, one of Mason's colleagues isusing the findings to develop a training tool to help prospectivecat people understand what their companions are telling them.

"You can say ... 'Look at the tilt of the eyes. Look at the gapbetween the nose and the mouth."'

No training tool is ever likely to completely unlock theirmystery, aptly expressed by the poet T.S. Eliot:

"There's no one like Macavity, There never was a Cat of suchdeceitfulness and suavity."