Signs pointed to Wettlaufer being a sloppy nurse, not serial killer, inquiry hears

The investigator charged with probingElizabeth Wettlaufer's ability to continue nursing when she was fired from a Woodstock, Ont., long-term care home heavily relied on a letter written by the disgraced nurse's lawyer to assess her mental health and addictions problems.

College of Nurses of Ontario investigator Karen Yeesaid she looked at Wettlaufer's case filefrom 1995, when, as a young nurse,Wettlauferstole narcotics from Geraldton District Hospital and tried to kill herself.

That fileincluded Wettlaufer's medical records and interviews with doctors to whom she confessed using street drugs. But the wording Yeeused to report what she found was almost identical to the wording from just one paper in that file, a letter from Wettlaufer'slawyer saying the overdose was a one-time situation and didn't mean the nurse was a habitual drug user.

Yee came under fire for not probing deeper on several aspects of Caressant Care's termination report to the college, including asking further questions about which medications were involved in errors made by Wettlaufer.

Caressant Care didn't give full picture

When Caressant Care contacted the College of Nurses, it did so more than a month after firing Wettlaufer.

That signalled that the issue wasn't urgent, Yee testified.

Despite emails between Caressant Care executives that characterized Wettlaufer as a danger to resident safety, those concerns weren't conveyed in writing or in a phone call between Yee and the nursing home's director of nursing.

"The nature of nursing practice is very busy and when I assessed [her medication errors],I knew it was not uncommon for a nurse to make medication errors," Yee testified. "These are common errors."

If the director of nursing had told her there were concerns about resident safety, Yee said she would have followed up further.

Instead, she ruled that Wettlauferdidn't need censure, but rather remedial work. Wettlaufer was asked to review her professional obligations on a website.

No way to ID a health care serial killer

There is "no existing methodology" to identify a health care serial killer, the head of Ontario's nursing regulatory body told the Wettlaufer inquiry in St. Thomas.

"We looked at the literature that could inform our processes and our risk assessments, and the literature was clear. There isn't an obvious checklist or indicator to detect a health care serial killer," said Anne Coghlan, executive director and CEO of the College of Nurses of Ontario.

"We looked at risk factors, and if there were any potential risk factors, and we learned it's not possible to catch health care serial killers. There is no existing methodology to identify a health care serial killer."

Coghlanwastestifying at the inquiry examining what problems in the long-term care system allowedWettlaufer to commit her crimes. Wettlauferkilled eight of her patients and tried to kill six others over almost a decade.

She confessed her crimes to a psychiatrist and was sentenced in June 2017 to eight concurrent life terms in prison.

Coghlansaidin cross-examination by a lawyer for the Ontario Nurses' Associationthat there were many problems with how Wettlauferworked.

"I saw a pattern of sloppy practice, an individual who was not responding to her employer's attempts to educate her. There was no trend in the type of incidents that she engaged in."

Coghlanwas asked by nurses' union lawyer Kate Hughes: "We've been gong through this evidence in hindsight and with a fine-tooth comb. You've gone through all the information as well. Were there any clues that you could see that this person was engaging in acts of murder, let alone serial murder?"

Coghlanresponded: "No. I andmy colleagues at the college have looked at this very closely to see if there were any clues, and we are confident that there weren't any clues that were missed. There were no clues."

The public inquiry began in June and is expected to last until September.