Candace Derksen retrial: Retired officer recalls mistake in original testimony - Action News
Home WebMail Saturday, November 23, 2024, 08:05 AM | Calgary | -12.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Candace Derksen retrial: Retired officer recalls mistake in original testimony

A retired police officer testified today in the retrial for Candace Derksen's killing he "woke up in the middle of the night" two weeks ago recalling that his previous testimony was inaccurate.

Retired police officer says he realized 2 weeks ago he put DNA evidence in a box for film, not an evidence bag

Mark Edward Grant was convicted in 2011 of second-degree murder in connection with the 1984 death of Candace Derksen, 13. In 2013, the Manitoba Court of Appeal ordered a new trial, ruling the trial judge was wrong to exclude evidence that the defence argued suggests Derksen might have been killed by someone else. (CBC)

A retired police officer testified today in the retrial for Candace Derksen's killing he "woke up in the middle of the night" two weeks ago recalling that his previous testimony was inaccurate.

Robert Parker was an identification officer with the Winnipeg Police Service in 1985. After a lengthy search, Candace Derksen, 13, was found dead on Jan. 17, 1985. She was found tied up inside a rarely used machine shed by employees at an industrial yard.

Parker was responsible for escorting the girl's frozen body to Seven Oaks General Hospital in Winnipeg and attending the autopsy.

It was also his duty to photograph her autopsy and "seize" and "bag" any items turned over by the medical examinerwhich would later become police exhibits.

On Wednesday morning the retrial'sthird day Parker testified he woke up two weeks agorealizing he did not in fact "bag" the twine used to tie up Candacebut in fact placed it in abox that had been previously used to store film.

"Quite honestly, what was bothering me the most is I was going over transcripts over previous testimony [and asking myself], 'Was I absolutely sure?,'" Parker said, referring to previous testimony that he would have bagged the twine.

He settled on the fact that he in fact put it in a photograph box, which he said was "very common" practice at the time.

During cross-examination, Grant's defence lawyer questionedParker on the accuracy of his police notes and labelling of exhibits at the time of the investigation, but did not specifically challenge him on placing the twine in a box rather than a bag.

The twine turned out to contain evidence crucial to laying charges against Grant. Aforensic specialist called on by the Crown linked the DNA to Grant and said there was a one in 50 million chance it belonged to anyone other than the accused.

A jury found Grant guilty of second-degree murder in 2011. Two years later, a Manitoba Court of Appeal judge ordered a retrial because evidence about a possible "third-party suspect" was withheld from jurors during the first trial.

The Crown asked Parker Wednesday why he recalled putting the twine in a box 32 years later. He responded that he was "not sure."

Girl found frostbitten

Parker told the court when Candace was found, her body was "completely frozen".

"The clothing on the body was quite soiled with what appeared to be a dirty material," he told the court. "The deceased's face appeared to be quite frostbitten."

Some of the items police seized at the autopsy included a clear plastic shroud that covered Candace's body during her transport to hospital.

Other items includedher jeans, her jacket which contained sticks of gum and a white metal ring with a heart-shaped stone in the pocket, Parker said.

The shroud, jeans and jacket were presented by the Crowninside individual plastic bags onWednesday.

During the defence's cross-examination of Parker, he was questioned regarding his knowledge of DNA in 1985 and the steps he took to protect the integrity of the scene.

"The protective clothing that was worn at the time was nil," Parker testified, adding as a plain clothes officer he was wearing his clothes of the day.

There were no DNA protocols in 1985, he said.

Retired officer Don Ogilvie,who worked with the RCMP's hair and fibre unit in 1985, testified later on Wednesday that heusedtweezers to pull the forensic evidence from police exhibits, including two large tree stumps found in the shed andCandace's jacket, jeans and right sock. Ogilvie said he then mounted the hair and fibres onto slides for analysis.

Ogilviesaid while doing so, hewould typically wear a fresh lab coat andgloves, and clean his work space between mounting each slide to avoid any contamination of evidence. He could not recall whether he wore gloves while examining the twine evidence and said he would not have worn a mask.

During his cross-examination,Ogilvieadded thetwine evidence arrived intwo plastic bags.

Masks not worn during autopsy

The defence also raised the point that masks were not worn at the scene where Candace was found or at her autopsy.

Parker testified he was shown a video recording of the 1985 autopsy for the first timetwo weeks ago.

Thejudge-only retrial began on Monday and is presided over by Justice KarenSimonsen.Brent Davidson and MichaelHimmelmanare acting for the Crown andSaul Simmonds is representing Grant.

On Thursday, the courtexpectsto hear fromRobert Chisnall, a knot specialist;John Burchill, a Winnipeg police criminal analyst; andRCMP scientists Tod ChristiansonandPamela Dixon.