Manitoba has 'embarrassingly weak' stance on doctor-assisted death, says ethics professor - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 11:03 AM | Calgary | 2.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Manitoba has 'embarrassingly weak' stance on doctor-assisted death, says ethics professor

A Manitoba ethics professor says doctors vehemently opposed to physician-assisted death should consider changing careers.

Arthur Schafer says province isn't doing enough to protect dignity, rights of patients

Doctors who can't provide patients with adequate information about all of the relevant options for assisted-dying are letting their patients down and not fulfilling their Hippocratic oath, says Arthur Schafer. (CBC)

A Manitoba ethics professor says doctors vehementlyopposed to physician-assisted death should consider changing careers.

ArthurSchafer,founding director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethicsat the University of Manitoba, also says Manitoba isn't doing enough toprotectthe dignity and rights of patients to have access to an assisted death.

Recently, the Christian Medical and Dental Association met with Manitoba Health Minister KelvinGoertzen to discuss conscience protection for doctors opposed tophysician-assisted death.

The association is alsoasking Ontario's top court to reverse a policy requiringdoctors to refer patients who want an assisted death to another doctor.

In Manitoba, doctors are only required to direct patients to a website that has information about assisted dying.

In an interview Friday with CBC's Information Radio,Schaferhad the following to say on the topic:


Q: What are your concernsabout the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba's position on this?

Manitoba's position is embarrassingly weak, I think, compared to the position taken by other colleges and especially the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons, which has been much more robust in protecting the dignity and rights of patients to have access to needed health care and at the same time, to protect physicians who have conscientious objections.

I don't think we have the balance right in Manitoba.

Q: What about doctors who have deeply held religious beliefs and say that referral to a websitestill gives patients the information they need but allows them to not be part of facilitating the process?

Let's take one step back. No college of physicians and surgeons is going to compel any doctor who has religious or ethical objections to perform a medical service. And we're not just talking about medical aid in dying, we're talking about prescriptions for abortionor contraception and so on.

One of thefundamental principles that every college, except perhaps Manitoba, is respecting is that doctorsshouldn't abandon their patients.- ArthurSchafer

But just to focus on medical assistance in death, what every province says is that, except in an emergency, doctors' conscientious objections should be respected. In an emergency, patients have a right of access and the life and health of my patient will be my first consideration that's the fundamental principle of theHippocratic oath and if a doctor can't respectthat, even in an emergency, then the physician should be either not practicing medicine or should be in a differentbranch of medicine sports medicine or pathology, whatever. No one's going to force anyone to act against their conscience but patients have a right to full information.

What the Manitoba college has said is that doctors don't even have to provide patients with access to information. That is, they don't have to inform the patients about all of their alternatives at the end of life, they can say, "Well, here's a website."

Remember, we're dealing with patients, some of whom may have real difficulty accessing information. One of the fundamental principles that every college, except perhaps Manitoba, is respecting is that doctorsshouldn't abandon their patients. So if you, as a physician can't perform a service, you should transfer the patient to a doctor who will. And there has to be a doctor who is accessible, it can't be someone at the other end of the country. Remember, we're talking about people who may be suffering intolerably, who may be at the end of life, who may have locked-in syndrome.

Referring someone to a website, crikey, not everyone has acomputer, not everyone is computer literate, not everyone has family to supportthem. Doctors shouldn't be forced to provide the service to which they object, except in an emergency, but they should be required professionally and they are in Ontario and not in Manitoba to inform their patients about all the alternatives and then to transfer the patient's care to someone who'll provide the service.

Q: What did the Supreme Court say about doctors' and patients' rights on this?

Yeah, that's an interesting question. In the Carter case, decided a little more than a year ago, what the Supreme Court said is that the rules and laws respecting physician-assisted death should respect the patient's right of access and the physician's right to conscientious objection. The two have to be reconciled [but] the Supreme Court didn't say how.

Into this breach, into this gap that the Supreme Court has left, either for legislation or for the professional bodies the colleges of physicians and surgeons in each province each provincial college has adaptedlegislation and Manitoba's is on the weaker end. I would hope that our medical colleagues would [raise] up their courage, respect patients' rights and dignities and at the same time, of course, not compel their colleague, except in an emergency, to provide a service to which they conscientiously object.

Q: What would you say about doctors whoholdreligious beliefs like this and feelthat if they have to go through the options about how to die that eventhat conversation goes against their fundamental beliefs?

What I would say is perhaps you should be practicing in a different branch of medicine or perhaps you shouldn't be practicing as a doctor. Patients are entitled to know what their options are. If doctors can't provide patients with adequate information about all of the relevant options for that patient, then the doctor is letting the patient down.

I would say thatalong with the version of the Hippocratic oath that our medical students allswear in Manitoba on their first day of medical school the life and health of my patient will be my first consideration.


Manitoba Health Minister KelvinGoertzenwas not available for an interview or to respond toSchafer's remarks.

In a written statement to CBC, the provincial governmentsaid there is an email address and phone number on the government's websitewhichallows people to connect with a medical team if they want information about how to obtain an assisted death.