Housing mentally ill homeless cheaper than alternative: study - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 05:49 PM | Calgary | -11.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Housing mentally ill homeless cheaper than alternative: study

New research has found its cheaper for governments to house homeless people with mental illnesses rather than pay for the problems associated with homelessness including health care, policing and temporary shelters.

Housing-first strategy proves effective solution for homeless with mental health issues

A new four-year study has found that a housing-first approach to people who are mentally ill and homeless is effective and saves taxpayers money.

New research has found its cheaper for governments to house homeless people with mental illnesses rather than pay for the problems associated with homelessness including health care, policing and temporary shelters.

The research findings come from a $110-million study started in 2008 in five Canadian cities including Winnipeg.

The Mental Health Commission of Canada used a federal grant to see if a housing first approach to homelessness and mental illness was a good way of transitioning people off of the streets.

It was the largest research study in the world targeting homelessness and mental health.

Essentially, the program, dubbed At Home, found housing for the homeless and mentally ill.

'Most terrible experience of my life'

Winnipegs Joe Hatch was one of them.

For 12 years, Hatch battled mental illness, eventually ending up on Winnipeg streets for a year and a half spending many nights under the Osborne Street Bridge.
Joe Hatch was homeless for a year and a half before entering the At Home program. He has now had housing for years and has a job. (CBC)

The university-educated man was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and lost his job, his wife, family and friends.

It was the most terrible experience of my life, he said.

Then, Hatch became involved with the At Home program, which found him a place to live on his own.

Oh its been great, said Hatch. Its a very nice place.

Hes now had stable housing for years and also has a job with the program.

Theres no doubt in my mind that without housing, I would have gone nowhere, he said.

Cheaper for taxpayers

On Tuesday, the results of the four-year study were released confirming that putting a roof over someones head helped them work through mental illness and kept them off the street long-term.

With more than 2,000 participants in Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, Montreal and Moncton, researchers said they found the program not only found the housing-first approach worked at keeping people off the street, but it also cost taxpayers less.

Researchers found for every $10 spent on a housing-first approach, taxpayers saved $21.72 on other services.

Feds buy in

Its a strategy Canadas Minister of State Candice Bergen said the federal government is already implementing.

We want lasting results and thats what housing first has demonstrated it can bring, she said.
Efforts by the federal government to fight homelessness are paying off, says the Minister of State for Social Development Candice Bergen. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Bergen said the federal governments homelessness partnering strategy will now include a housing-first approach.

Groups that currently get federal funding will have to put 65 per cent of it to programs like At Home.

Bergen said the savings on emergency services, hospitals, police [and] shelters will make a big impact.

The cost that is borne by the taxpayer is big, she said.

Louise Bradley, the CEO of the Mental Health Commission of Canada, said the program wasnt just about providing people with a house.

At Home offered them physical safety, but it also offered them a rare and precious thing dignity and respect, said Bradley.

But the director of operations at a Winnipeg homeless shelter said hes cautious about the results.

Its not a one size fits all, said Dan Maxson of Siloam Mission. It doesnt address the community issues. It doesnt address all of their health issues.