Manitoba court orders new trial for man convicted of killing Winnipeg woman when he was a teen

Manitoba's highest court has overturned the conviction of a man who was found guilty of killing a Winnipeg woman when he was 16, after finding the trial judge's failure to properly instruct the jury prejudiced his right to a fair trial.

The provincial Court of Appeal said in its decision the judge failed to correctly instruct the jury on how to weigh statements the youth made in the immediate aftermath of the 2019 killing of LiseDanais,ordering a new trial.

Danais, 51, was found with brutal injuries in her home near the Royal Canadian Mint in the morning of March 26, 2019. She was rushed to hospital, but died shortly afterward.

A juryfound the youth, who was known to Danais,guilty of second-degree murder in the death in 2022. Hewas given the maximum seven-year sentence for youths.

Because he was a youth at the time, the mancannot be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act, and CBC News is not revealing some details in the case as they could identify him.

During the trial, the Crown argued he was the only person with the time and opportunity to kill her, and that he hadcarefully planned it out.

But the appeal court found arguments by the prosecution that some of the youth's statements to policeand 911 operators had been deliberate lies meant to support his innocence were weak, and that the Crown failed to provide any evidence they were fabrications.

"The Crown was not only arguing that the young person's statements were untruthful and should be disbelieved, but that he made those untruthful statements because he knew that he had killed the deceased," Justice Holly Beard wrote on behalf of the courtin the 47-page decision.

"The Crown was inviting the jury to draw the impermissible inference that the disbelieved statements were evidence of guilt."

The trial judge instructed the jury they could use the evidence to support an inference of guiltafter weighing in and rejecting any innocent explanation for the statements.

But the appeal court's decision said the judge should have instructed themto ignorethe statements, as the Crown didn't provide any evidence they were lies.

"Even if the jury found that some of the conduct was false, that finding could not be used as evidence of guilt, unless that conduct was fabricated," the decision said.

"In fact, [the judge's] instruction states the opposite it directs that after-the-fact conduct that has no innocent explanation (i.e., a lie) can be used to infer guilt."

The youth called 911 to say he found the body at about 10:43 a.m. He said he leftthe house at around 7:30 a.m. to run some errands, assumingDanaiswas still asleep because her bedroom door was closed.

Security footage showed the youth was the only person to leave and enter the home the morning she was found, but the defence argued the videos only captured about 11 per cent of the time he was away, and missed many things.

The Crown submitted three alleged lies it said were meant to back his story, but the appeal court said the evidence didn't support the prosecution's claims.

During the appeal process, the Crown argued the evidence of fabrication comes from the circumstances around the youth's conduct. But the appealcourt said none of the details in the case constitute independent evidence.

That includes the youth telling 911 operators and police about a co-worker who had been "bothering her."

The Crown had argued that the youth had set them up as "the perfect fall guy" as Danais had filed complaints against him. But the decision said the youth never volunteered him as an alternate suspect and that he only brought it up when prompted.

It said several people brought up similar concerns about him to police, and that the youth's naming of the co-worker was not dishonest.