Manitoba Hydro debt rises another $1.9B due to Keeyask and Bipole III

Manitoba Hydro's debt rose $1.9 billion this year because of expenditures related to major projects in the north of the province.

In its report for the fiscal year ending on March 31, 2017, the provincial Crown corporation pegged its long-term debt at $16.1 billion, up from $14.2 billion at the same time in 2016.

The construction of the Keeyaskhydro-electric development on the Nelson River at the same time as the BipoleIII transmission line is the main factorin the increasing debt, according to the report published on Friday.

• Manitoba Hydro faces tough choices to battle massive debt
• Manitoba Hydro to shrink workforce by roughly 900 positions

"Previous decisions by Manitoba Hydro to buildBipoleIII while simultaneously advancing the construction ofKeeyaskwill double the corporation's debt in a relatively short time frame," the report states.

"In addition, persistent low prices in the short-term opportunity export market, primarily as a result of shale gas exploration and subsidies for development of wind and solar resources in the United States, combined with lower than forecasted electrical load growth here in Manitoba, are expected to reduce projected revenues by approximately $1.5 billion over the next decade.

"Adding to the financial implications of this shortfall is a nearly $3 billion projected increase in the capital costs forKeeyaskandBipoleIII."

• Manitoba Hydro is a 'ticking time bomb' that needs financial help from province: board chair
• Manitoba Hydro income down, debt on the rise

While debt is up, the corporation's net income improved in 2016-2017 to $59 million, up $20 million from the previous year.

Manitoba Hydro president and CEO Kelvin Shepherd said he expects debt to grow by an additional $8 billion in the coming years as construction at Keeyask and BipoleIII continue. He noted the utility has applied for rate hikes to help cover the cost of borrowing.

Winnipeg Harvest and the Manitoba branch of theConsumers Association of Canada oppose the hike on the basis Hydro can afford to live without the additional revenue, said attorney Katrine Dilay of the Public Interest Law Centre.

Steven Fletcher, the former Progressive Conservative MLA and a Hydro critic whowill sit as an independent next fall,said he, too, is concerned about rate hikes but is less confident Hydro is on stable footing.

Crown Services Minister Ron Schuler said he too is concerned about Hydro's debt but laid the blame at the feet of his predecessor.

"The major reason for Hydro's deteriorating financial position is the reckless decision by the previous government to proceed with Keeyask and Bipole III without proper scrutiny by the Public Utilities Board," Schulersaid in a statement.

"Now with a proposed rate hike from Manitoba Hydro and our province's recent credit downgrade, Manitobans continue to see the harmful effects of the previous government's mismanagement and political interference of Manitoba Hydro."

The NDP accused the Tories of exaggeration.

"The premier needs to stop undermining the reputation of Manitoba Hydro and get back to the job of marketing our green energy to our Canadian and American neighbours," NDP press secretary Rachel Morgan said in a statement.