U of M faculty strike talks hits stalemate, mediator calls for binding arbitration

The mediator trying to find a middle ground in the three-week-longUniversity of Manitoba faculty strike has hit an impasse and is recommendingbinding arbitration to resolve the dispute.

Arne Peltzadvised the two sides this weekend that he believes there is no likelihood theywill reach a settlement without a protracted strike continuing.

As such, binding arbitration in which a decision islegally binding and enforceable, similar to a court order is the best path forward to an agreement, he suggested.

The U of M put out a news release on Monday saying it accepts the recommendation.

The University of Manitoba Faculty Association,for its part, doesn't tend to agree.

In an email to CBC Newsattributed to presidentOrvie Dingwall, the union said itis reviewing the proposaland "will make a counter-proposal regarding the specifics of an arbitration."

UMFA, which represents over 1,200 professors, instructors and librarians at the Winnipeg-based university, went on strike Nov. 2.

The association is seekinghigher salariesfor itsmembers, arguing that persistently low pay is causingretention and recruitment problems. The U of M ranks second to last out of the 15 research-based institutions in terms of salary.

The union hasalsocitedgovernment interference in the bargaining processas preventing successful negotiations with university administration.

Last week, UMFA tabled anoffer to the university's administration the union says would have addressed the issue of retention and recruitment of UMFA members and could have ended the strike, but the administration chose to reject itor to make a counter-offer.

"In addition to addressing the administration's unwillingness to present a realistic offer to UMFA members, the two sides have not yet agreed on issues relating to working conditions,"Dingwall said in the release from UMFA.

"Specifically, the administration continues to refuse language that allows faculty to take their full vacation and refuses to accept language that would prevent the administration from forcing members to teach their classes online in non-pandemic times.

"UMFA strongly believes that these outstanding issues must be addressed before the association could agree to binding arbitration to address financial compensation. UMFA will inform the university of these outstanding conditions as a pre-condition before any discussions of binding arbitration would begin."