Parker developer claims police not doing enough to remove protesters - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 11, 2024, 04:10 AM | Calgary | -1.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Parker developer claims police not doing enough to remove protesters

The Winnipeg developer who owns the Parker neighbourhood claims police aren't doing enough to remove protestors including one in possession of an axe and several wearing masks from an encampment on his Fort Garry property.

Gem Equities also alleges protester followed company employee around Fort Garry site with an axe

Gem Equities claims this Parker protester followed one of its employees around the site with an axe. Protesters say it was used to chop wood for a fire and insist there are no weapons at their encampment. (Chris Snelgrove/Gem Equities)

The Winnipeg developer who owns the Parker neighbourhoodclaims police aren't doing enough to remove protestersincluding one in possession of an axe and several wearing masksfrom an encampment on hisFort Garry property.

Lawyers representing developer Andrew Marquess and his company Gem Equities will appear in court Wednesday in an attempt to remove protesters from an unserviced triangle of land that makes most of theParker neighbourhood. Marquess acquired the 24-hectare property in 2009 from the City of Winnipeg in exchange for a smaller parcel of serviced land in the former Fort Rouge Yards.

Marquess plans to convert most of Parker into a residential development called Oak Grove. In 2016, consultants working for Gem unveiled aconceptual plan that includedhigh-density towers, medium-density low-rise buildings and low-density townhouses and single-family homes, extending away from a Southwest Transitway stationplaza in concentric circles.

Before Gem can proceed, city council must approve an area plan, rezonings and development plans, all of which are bound to face opposition from area residents who oppose the destruction of aspen forests on the property and protesters who set up camp last week, when Gem began clearing trees from the site.

On Thursday, Gem's lawyers initiated legal action to remove the protesters, accusingthem of trespassing and delaying work necessary to begin construction on the land.

In a supplementary motion brief, Gem's lawyers claim the Winnipeg Police Service has failed to remove protesters who've been asked to leave repeatedly.

"Instead of enforcing the law, the Winnipeg Police Service has failed to remove the trespassers and even granted them permission to have fires on the plaintiffs' property," lawyers Kevin Toyne and Dave Hill state in the motion.

"The basis for the special treatment being accorded to the trespassers by the police is currently unknown, although one of the organizers is the daughter of a prominent former member of city council and now sitting member of parliament."

'No due process'

The lawyers are referring to Jenna Vandal, daughter of former St. Boniface Coun. Dan Vandal, who's now the LiberalMP for Saint Boniface-Saint Vital.

"I expected that this would happen," Jenna Vandal said Tuesday in an interview, referring to the court action. She said she is protesting the development of a natural area located near the former site of Rooster Town, a Mtis community that encompassed part of the Grant Park neighbourhood, to the north, from the 1930s to 1950s.

"There was no due process before this 2009 land swap happened," she said, referring to the findings of a 2014 audit of Winnipeg real-estate transactions. It concludedthe city failedto conduct an appraisal of the Parker lands before exchanging those lands for part ofGem's Fort Rouge property.

'We have no weapons'

Toyne and Hill also allege in their supplementary motion that some of the Parker protesters are wearing masks to conceal their identities and claim one protester followed Gem employee Chris Snelgrovearound the site with an axe on Friday.

In an affidavit, Snelgroveclaimedhe "asked the trespasserfollowing me with the axe to put it down. He did not do soand I was mocked by the trespassers for making this request. The trespassers claimed the axe was being used to remove tree stumps to prevent them from inuring themselves while they trespass."

This allegation has not been proven in court. Vandal said the axe was being used to chop wood for a fire.

"He was just holding the axe after chopping wood," she said. "We have no weapons on site. It's been the most peaceful protest, the whole time."

Toyneinsisted that an axe is a weapon.

"It's a weapon that has a blade on it," he said Tuesday in an interview. "It's currently unknownhow many other weapons are currently being hidden in the illegal encampment."

Owners of the Parker lands, slated for development by Gem Equities, have filed a lawsuit against protesters and an injunction demanding the group leave. Demonstrators say the land is contested Indigenous land and home to endangered wildlife. (Laura Glowacki/CBC)

Wednesday's hearing is slated for 10 a.m. Vandal, one of four protesters named in the motion, said she intends to represent herself.

A 2014 environmental review conducted by the city before work started on the second phase of the Southwest Transitwaydescribed the Parker lands "asa mix of open grassland with small patches of oak,aspenwoods and moist depressions of cattails, dogwood and willows."

The study found no rare plant species on the site, but did note the presence of impressivebur oaks and peachleaf willows and several stands of showy milkweed, a vital food source for monarch butterflies.

The study also said the moist patches of the site were likely to serve as habitat for northern leopard frogs, while the treescould serve as"temporary feeding or resting areas" for peregrine falcons, which are endangered, as well as other bird species of concern.