Springfield council green-lights hazardous waste plant despite opposition

A community is granting a hazardous waste disposal company permissionto set up a new facility just inside the Perimeter Highway despite numerous concerns from locals.

About 25 people attended a Springfield municipal council meeting Thursday where councillors voted4-2 in favour of allowing Tervita Corporation to build a new waste transfer facility on a lot off Redonda Street.

"I'm disappointed that there wasn't enough vision within the council to see this is a bad decision," said Jim Stevenson, one of about 10 peoplewho voiced opposition at the meeting.

Assuming Tervita passes regulator hoops at the provincial level, council imposed 11 conditions on the permit, including a review four years from nowthat would determine whether the companywill be allowed to continue business in the area.

Tervita primarily handles waste products from Alberta'soil and mining industries, though they also treat or dispose of pesticides, batteries, light bulbs, oil filters and scores of other hazardous byproducts from industrial or household activities.

Many of the materials at the new facility will be consolidated and treated before being sent elsewhere for further processing, the company said.

CouncillorsRick Wilson and Glen Fuhlwere against the application, citing fears of pollution and that thefacility could hurt the local economy.

"All the regulations in the world do not help you if there's an accident," Wilson said ahead of the vote.

"To put an element like this into our premier industrial area increases risk, it reduces the ability of our business to attract investment."

Coun. Howard BerdinsupportedTervita's bid.

Hesaid there are a number of businesses in the same industrial area that alreadysell or use a variety of hazardous materials every day that aren't currently held to the same tough regulatory standards Tervitawill be facing.

"We're living in a hazardous waste society," he said. "Somebody's got to clean it up and protect it."

Stevenson feels strongly people in the area weren't properly consulted.

Heowns and operatesEagle Industrial across from where Tervita's new facility will be constructed, and he worries the presence of the plant could have bad environmental and personal impacts on his employees.

He gave credit to Mayor Tiffany Fell for proposing the four-year review period, but is worried about what could happen in that time.

"I'm just hoping that the valuation of our buildings haven't dropped enough that they lose tax base in the Springfield industrial park."

Stevenson pointed to incidents atTervita facilities as evidence to suggest the company doesn't belong in the community.

Virden, Man., sued Tervitain 2016. The town entered into a contract with Hazco Environmental Services in 2006 to operate the local industrial waste facility.

In the lawsuit the town alleged the company put local ground water and soil health at risk.

Another incident at aTervita plant near Unity, Sask., almost two years ago led to complaints aboutcaustic odours making some locals feelsick.

The Saskatchewan government investigatedand found the smell came from a corrosive liquid waste shipment that wasn't approved for disposal at the site.

Test samples taken by Environment and Climate Change Canadafound no serious long-term health effects should be expected.

Former Springfield municipal councillor Heather Erickson said because the community is serviced by well water, it isn't worth the risk.

"Whenever you put something like this on top of an aquifer you run risk of ruining our water or potentially eliminating our supply of water," she said.

Susan Ziemski wrote to members of town council asking them to not let Tervitaopen a new plant.

"I think it's shameful to be bringing this into the community," she said. "We need these kind of plants but they just don't have to be where they decided to put it."

Tervita vice-president Michael Erickson said the risk of an accident or problem odours is very low.

Erickson said the company works with local governments to ensure operations meet strict safety and environmental standards.

The company employs about 1,700 employees at more than 100 facilities across North America, includinga facility in St. James that has been operated for over a decade with only a few minor incidents, said Erickson.

He said he understands why people might be reluctant to embrace the company but he wants locals to rest assured that there is nothing to fear.

"When it comes to hazardous waste station, the term hazardous waste is scary, I get that," he said.

"My desk is a stone's throw away from exactly what's being proposed here," said Erickson.

"As time progresses I'm hoping we can endear ourselves to these neighbours, partially through education and partially through exposure of just being good neighbours [and] alleviate those anxieties."