Terrorism mailout from Conservative MP Lawrence Toet called 'preposterous' - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 11:08 PM | Calgary | 0.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Terrorism mailout from Conservative MP Lawrence Toet called 'preposterous'

A mailout with a "preposterous" question on terrorism from Conservative MP Lawrence Toet is getting a lot of attention on social media.

People online angry at 'you're for us or you're against us' nature of terrorism question

Terrorism mailout from Conservative MP Lawrence Toet called 'preposterous'

10 years ago
Duration 1:39
A mailout with a "preposterous" question on terrorism from Conservative MP Lawrence Toet is getting a lot of attention on social media.

A mailoutwith a "loaded"question on terrorismfrom Conservative MP Lawrence Toetis gettinga lot of attention on social media.

Toet, who represents theElmwood-Transconariding in Winnipeg, sent the mailer this week aboutBill C-51, the Conservatives' proposed anti-terrorism legislation.

After pitching the Conservative argument for the bill, Toet's mailout asks"What do you think?" and requests people check off one of the following options:

  • I agree with my MP Lawrence Toet. We must take additional action to protect Canada from terrorism.
  • I disagree. Terrorists are victims too.

"It's a loaded question," said Curtis Brown,one of those who received themailouton Monday.

"What it's really about is identifying potential supporters and also people who are hostile towards you."

Brown, who isthevice-president of Probe Research, a public opinion research firm,posted a photo of the question on Twitter, where it quickly spread and jumped to social networking and news websiteReddit.

A mailout from Winnipeg Conservative MP Lawrence Toet asks people to choose: do they think terrorists are victims, or do they agree with the federal government's anti-terrorism push. (Curtis Brown)
"I was just kind of making a joke about it because, you know, I mean for us or for another polling company to ask a question like that,sort of phrased in that way, would be preposterous," he said.

"It's not a legitimate way of asking people what they think about Bill C-51 or about terrorism."

Many people have expressed outrage at the "you're with us or you're against us" nature of the question and the money spent to send it out, Brown said.

Toet did not respond to CBC News' requests for an interview on Wednesday.

Elmwood-Transconaconstituents react

Some people living in the Elmwood-Transcona riding were shocked when they saw Toet's question.

Conservative MP Lawrence Toet sent out the mailer this week. ((CBC))
"It's the stupidest thing I ever saw,"Patrick Henderson saidafter viewing the mailout for the first time.

Upon being told his member of Parliament had put out the flyer in question, Henderson remarked, "I think that's kind of pathetic."

Doug Smartsaid he has met Toet and calls him a niceman, but the mailout question is stupid, he said.

"Terrorists are victims too? Come on. I think it's a stupid question," Smart said, adding the flyerwill be going straight into the recycling bin.

Doug Smart said the mailout will be going straight into the recycling bin. (Jill Coubrough/CBC)
"I thought better of him," Smart said of Toet. "I've met himand he's a nice enough guy, but I'm surprised that he would OK a poll like that."

Federal NDP leader Tom Mulcair said on Wednesday the survey reflects a viewpoint pervasive in Conservative circles.

It's the same approach as Stephen Harper.It's the same approach as Vic Toews, you know: You're with us or against us; you can stand with us or stand with the pedophiles," he said.

It's the same ludicrous divisive approach that the Conservatives have been taking for years.Canadians deserve better."

On Friday, federal privacy watchdog Daniel Therrien said thescope of theConservative government's anti-terrorism billis excessive and that it puts the personal information of Canadians at risk.

More than100 academics have also urged the governmentto drastically alter C-51, arguing it is far too broad and doesn't come with safeguards to protect Canadians' privacy rights.