Officers 'angry and frustrated' as city approves changes to police pension plan: union

A long day of debate at Winnipeg city hall didn't end well for the union that representsmore than 1,400 city police officers.

Despite a huge presence at Thursday's council meeting from officers, their familiesand their retired colleagues, the Winnipeg Police Association's plea forthe city to leave the police pension unchanged came up empty.

In a close decision, city council voted 9-7 infavour of a motion that would make amendments tothe police pension plan, includingremovingovertime as pensionable salary.

Heated debate on the proposal had been going on for weeks, with the cash-strapped city arguing it will save millions, while the union said the move would violate a collective agreement.

Winnipeg Police Association president Maurice Sabourinsaid the changes are aslap in the face to the city's police officers, as crime continues to escalate in Winnipeg and officers are facing an increasing workload, stress and illness.

"This is the big thank you," he said following Thursday's vote.

"The city is changing a pension plan that we have negotiated the conditions [of] for the past 40 years. A deal is a deal is a deal. To break thatour members are feeling very frustrated and angry."

Savings to be redirected to police budget

In addition to removing overtime from pensionable salary, the amendments to the pension planincluded changes to early retirement provisions, and altering what the city has called a contribution split that is"disproportionately high compared to other similar pension plans."

The city's current contribution to the police pension plan is18.48 per cent of pensionable earnings, while members of the police service contribute eight per cent of earnings.

Under the amendment, that will gradually change each year until 2024, when the city's and members' contributions will be equalized at 11.5 per cent.

The reforms will beimplemented April 1, 2020.

The city estimates the changes will savean estimated $32.9 million from 2020-23.

The city also voted on Thursday to redirect $14.74 million of those savings over the four-year periodto the Winnipeg Police Service's operating budget, to head off job cuts the police service warned may be necessary to meet the city's budget targets.

Sabourin calls the move an insult and a mistake.

"It is not right to expect the pension plan of our members to be paying for operational services of the Winnipeg Police Service, any more than you would expect transit operators to pay out of their pension to keep fares lower, or public employees to pay from their own pockets to build new bridges,"Sabourin said following Thursday's vote.

The police union has already filed a grievance over the issue.

Concerned about cuts, not pensions

Councillorsopposed to changing the pension plan said the city is setting itself up for a lawsuit. Coun. Kevin Klein (Charleswood-Tuxedo-Westwood) warned massive legal bills could eat up any savings the city sees through the changes.

"What if we lose in court? The money we promised to hire more officers, we wouldn't have that anymore," said Klein.

Coun. Vivian Santos (Point Douglas) voted against the amendments, but before that, shetold her colleagues it's time tostop pouring city resources into law enforcement and look at other ways to increase safety in the city.

"We need to stop being reactive to the symptoms. We need to be proactive, get our kids off the streets," she said. "Get these kids into schooling, eating healthy. Support our growing multi-cultural families by offering them a safe communityspace."

The pension plan changes come as the cityis looking at considerable belt-tightening ina budget-planning processthat calls for small increases or freezes for city departments over the next four years.

Santos saysresidents in her ward are telling her they are worried about proposed cuts to transit, community centres and forestry. She says no one raised concerns about altering police pensions.

Sabourinsaid that in light of the coming change, he is worried the 200 officers currently eligible to retire will submit their retirement papers now, leaving even fewer officers on the force. The police union president said he received 15 emails from members sitting in the gallery during the council meeting saying they are planning to retire.

Some councillors wanted to delay the vote until the matter had been heard by a labour arbitrator.

That proposal was defeated.