Muddying up Winnipeg's roadmap

Over the past two months, theoversized and unpopular project known as the Marion Street widening has been sitting on the infrastructure-funding version of death row.

St. Bonifaceresidents couldn't stand the project, which called for an underpass or overpass at the railway crossing just east of Archibald Street, complete with enough offramps and onrampsto create a concrete forest on the far side of the Seine River.

City councillorsbecame equally unenthused when they learned theprojected pricetaghad ballooned to$566 million, a figure that would have required the city to spend $20 million a year, if the widening went ahead.

Tomorrow at city hall, council is poised to kill the project and order theconsulting firm MMM Groupto come up with a less expensive and less disruptive alternative.

That's what people in St. Boniface want. But the cancellation will only serve to further muddy the waters when it comes to transportation planning and infrastructure funding in Winnipeg.

If any city councillorsplan to stomp their feettomorrow and decry the lousy manner in which the Marion Street widening was conceived, they better take a mirror to the council meeting.

That's because it's only been 20months since this very same city council yes, the one led by Brian Bowman declared the Marion widening Winnipeg's No. 2 infrastructure priority.

In March 2015, council reordered Winnipeg infrastructure-funding priorities, placing the Waverley underpass first and the Marion widening second.

• Waverley 1st, Marion 2nd after EPC reorders Winnipeg infrastructure priorities
• City council green lightsWaverleyunderpass, stops motion to delay project

Officially, this was all about promoting safety, as the disaster at Lac-Megantic, Que. remained a fresh wound in the nation's psyche. But the ranking also served the city well in its efforts to secure federal funding for major infrastructure projects.

The Waverleyunderpass was a big priority in the federal ridings of Winnipeg South, where Conservative MP Rod Bruinooge was about to retire, andWinnipeg South Centre, where unpopular ToryJoyce Batemanwas about to face a challenge from Liberal Jim Carr.

The Marion widening sat in Saint Boniface-Saint Vital, whichbecame a wide-open race after far more formidable Tory MP Shelly Gloverannounced her own plan to retire.

So when council declared Waverley and Marion the top twoWinnipeg priorities, italso increased the likelihood the former Harper government would fund those projects. It doesn't really matter now that all three of those ridings went Liberal.

But it does matter that the Waverley project is going ahead, while the Marion widening remains in limbo?

Why? Back in 2011, four years before city council made a political decision about infrastructure priorities, city transportation planners came up with a priority list of their own.

That list, which appears in the 2011 Transportation Master Plan, declares the Marion widening and railway overpass an immediate priority for Winnipeg. That means planners wanted it to be finished by 2016.

The Waverley underpass was onlyan intermediate priority. The planners determined it ought to be completed between 2016 and 2021.

Nonetheless, city council voted to allow the Waverley underpass to jump the funding queue, leaping over the only short-term infrastructure priority the city has failed to start besides the Marion widening.

Louise Bridge replacement in limbo

That would be the replacement of the Louise Bridge, which the city continually puts off, even though the steel span across the Red River was built in 1910 and is very close to the end of its usable life.

The future of the Louise Bridge is in limbo while the city studies where exactly the East Transitway should cross the Red River. There's a chance a new, extra-wide Louise Bridge could carry buses as well as cars and trucks.

Regardless, transportation planners concerned about the prospect of inner-city gridlock are itching to see the city commit to replacing the Louise Bridgebefore it greenlightsother projects on the intermediate-priority list.

That listincludes suburban projects such as the western extension of Chief Peguis Trail to McPhillips Street, the southern extension of the William R. Clement Parkway to Wilkes Avenue and something completely new called the Edward Schreyer Parkway, which is supposed to connect Plessis Road to Chief Peguis Trail.

The problem is, nobody has bothered to update either of the city's infrastructure-priority lists. The Transportation Master Plan is five years old, while council's political priorities are unknown, at least to the public.

This presents a problem when Bowman tries to convince his federal and provincial colleagues to fork over money for municipal infrastructure. As well, theTrudeau government is more interested in transit than it is in roads.

• Ottawa promises flexibility when it comes to transit cash
• Brian Bowman hopes for new infrastructure funding model underPallister

On Nov. 22, the city should provide some clarity in the form of the 2017 budget, which includes a six-year capital-funding forecast. For starters, it should indicate whether Winnipegexpects Ottawa to pay for part of the city's $53-million transit-garage expansion.

It may also indicate whether the city expects Ottawa to keep cash on the table for some form of Marion widening. While the half-billion-dollar version of that project will die tomorrow, transportation planners will keep pushing for a successor version.

The budget may also offer zero clarity about the city's intentions. Given the way transportation planning has been conducted in the past in this city, this would not be a radical development.