Winnipeg facility that produces essential cancer-screening material fails 4th Health Canada inspection - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 08:31 AM | Calgary | -12.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Manitoba

Winnipeg facility that produces essential cancer-screening material fails 4th Health Canada inspection

A provincially run facility that creates crucial materials used to detect cancer failed its latest Health Canada inspection after the regulator found the Winnipeg facility mishandled test results, didnt follow proper sterility practices and inadequately trained workers.

Non-compliant rating puts facility at risk of getting shut down by health regulator, experts say

A picture of a person wearing glasses and a lab coat standing in front of an open door holding tubes in a medical laboratory.
A photo shows the cyclotron facility at the Sylvia Fedoruk Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation in Saskatoon, which produces medical isotopes for Saskatchewan. The Winnipeg facility that fills that role in Manitoba has failed its Health Canada inspection for the fourth time. The Saskatoon facility has never had a non-compliant rating from Health Canada. (Submitted by John Root)

A provincially run Manitoba facility that creates crucial materials used to detect cancer failed its latest Health Canada inspectionafter the regulator found the facility mishandled test results, didn't follow proper sterility practices and inadequately trained workers.

This is the fourth time the Winnipeg Cyclotron Facility the sole producer of medical isotopes in Manitoba was found non-compliant by Health Canada in the past 10 years.

These isotopes are used to create the radioactive material often called a tracer that is injected into patients during a positron emission tomography, or PET, scan.

The most common tracer uses a form of radioactive sugar and accumulates in abnormal spots to highlight possible tumours in a scan.That can help a doctor decide where the cancer is, how far it has spread, whether it has responded to therapy or if a cancer has come back.

One doctor says the facility needs more staff and resources to meet the high bar set by Health Canada.

The regulator is "very particular," said Dr. Daniel Levin, a nuclear medicine physician at Winnipeg's Health Sciences Centre, which is also where theWinnipeg Cyclotron Facility is located.

The facility, he said, "has very good staff that are there, but it doesn't have enough staff to meet all the requirements. It hasn't had the support, perhaps, that it should have."

A man with grey hair and a beard.
John Root, executive director of the University of Saskatchewan's Fedoruk Centre for Nuclear Innovation, said the danger in failing inspections is losing a Health Canada licence. (Jason Warick/CBC)

Levin doesn't work in the facility,but as a nuclear medicine physician is responsible for reporting onPET scans and works with the facility.

Levin said the materials created there are safe, but the real threat is thatHealth Canada could pull itsdrug establishment licencethe federally issued licencethat allows the facility to make and distributeisotopes.

John Root agrees. He's the executive director of the Sylvia Fedoruk Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation, a non-profit corporation located at the University of Saskatchewan that'sresponsible for producing the medical isotopes for that province.

His facility has never had a non-compliant rating from Health Canada.

But if a facility's licence is revoked, "you're not allowed to make [isotopes]any more. So being non-compliant could be bad."

Failed 3 previous tests

That's what almost happened to the Winnipeg facility in 2018.

The facility failed its 2017 inspection, and the regulator threatened to suspend its licence after it felt the facility didn't do enough to address thefindings, according to Health Canada's drug and health product inspection database.

In the end, a spokesperson for the provincial health agency Shared Health said theWinnipeg Cyclotron Facility wasable to demonstrate "sufficient progress on the outstanding corrective actions" to maintain its licence.

The facility, which opened in 2010,also failed its 2020 inspection and its first recorded inspection in 2013, which found 21 deficiencies,including issues with disinfection, poor documentation and testing procedures.

WATCH | Here's what the Winnipeg Cyclotron Facility does and why it matters:

Winnipeg facility that produces essential cancer-screening material fails inspection for 4th time

7 months ago
Duration 3:15
The Winnipeg Cyclotron Facility makes medical isotopes, which are critical in detecting certain cancers. It has failed its most recent Health Canada inspection and is at risk of being temporarily closed, which would delay cancer screening for some patients.

The routine inspectionsaredone every few years to ensure the facilitymeets the regulator's standards.

The latest, which found the facility non-compliant, was launched in late October andflagged nine deficiencieswith the facility under Canada's Food and Drug regulations.

Four involved quality control regulations, three involved sterility regulations and the others concerned personnel and record keeping.

The non-compliant rating forced the facility to close for two and a halfweeks to address the issues, which delayed 35 PET scans, said a spokesperson for Shared Health.

Both Levin and Root said it is important to be able to make the tracer in Manitoba. The materials have a short lifespan, and the longer it takes to transport from a facility to being injected into a patient, the less usable tracer there will be.

A portrait of a man with no hair.
Dr. Daniel Levin is a nuclear medicine doctor who does reports on PET scans for the doctors who order them. He says it's important to be able to make the tracer in Manitoba. 'If we can't produce it here, we'd be doing [scans for] half as many patients,' he said. (Submitted by Dr. Daniel Levin)

That could meandoing only 10 scans a day instead of 20, said Levin.

"If we can't produce it here, we'd be doing half as many patients," said Levin.

'No quality management program in place'

The latest inspection failurecomes at a time when more PET scans are being ordered by doctors.

Data provided by Shared Health shows about 175 scans were donein February 2020. Now, more than300 are completed each month.

The median wait for a scan is about two weeks, according to Shared Health.

A large piece of equipment in a laboratory that is blue and yellow.
The cyclotron at Saskatoon's Sylvia Fedoruk Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation. This cyclotron is similar to the one at the Winnipeg Cyclotron Facility. (Submitted by John Root)

A 2020 externalreview of the Winnipeg Cyclotron Facility obtained by CBCintended tocreate a long-term plan to ensure the cyclotron program remained successful, up-to-date and clinically relevantaddressed its past failed inspections. It foundthe facility was consistently failing in the same areas quality assurance and quality control.

Therewas"no quality management program in place that could prove things were actually under control," the review found.

It recommended creating new staff positions, such as a radiochemistwho could provide leadership at the facility and ensure it meetsquality control requirements.

When asked about its response to the 2020 review, a Shared Health spokespersonsaidmore resources were dedicated to a quality assurance program and four new full-time equivalent positions were added.

Shared Health is also in the process of hiring a lead radiochemist, who will begin in spring, the spokesperson said. Because it is a new position, it took longer than usual to develop and fillfollowing the review, the spokesperson said.

In response to the most recent failure, a Shared Health spokesperson said the facility has made changes to its organizational structure, and implemented sterility tests, among other measures.

So far, Shared Health says the deficiencies found by Health Canada did not impact the results of any PET scans, the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said there have been no documented adverse reactions from the roughly 25,000 PET scans completed at the facility in the last 12 years.

"Patient safety is our top priority, and in the event that an investigation indicates that there may be an impact to a patient, a product recall is considered," the spokesperson wrote in a prepared statement.

Shared Health has submitted a plan that is under review by Health Canada, the regulator said in a statement.

The facility will soon undergo another inspection, where Health Canada will decide if it has done enough to be given a compliant inspection rating.

In a prepared statement, Manitoba Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara said they welcome these inspections and will address "any concerns brought to my attention regarding staffing or resources."