8 maps that explain Quebec's surprise election results

A lot of us are still scratching our heads at Monday night's election results.

The Coalition AvenirQubecended up with a much larger majority than anyone was expecting.

Support for both theLiberals and the PartiQubcoisdropped well below theirhistoric baselines, while small left-wing QubecSolidairebroke out of its Montreal enclave.

• For all CBC's2018 election coverage, go to Quebec Votes 2018
• Low voter turnout in Montreal's west end shows Anglo disillusionment with Liberals

In order to get a better sense of why this happened we dove into the dataand produced a few maps that help tell the story of the election.

These maps may look a little funky, but they've been designed so thateach ridings appears as a hexagon of equal size.

This should make it easier to pick out geographic and socio-economicpatterns.

• Read more about why we chose to show ridings this way.

CAQ: carriedby the francophonenon-immigrant vote

One of the biggest factors that explains the CAQ victory was the party's appeal among French-speaking Quebecers.

Thismapshows a high concentration of CAQ voters in ridings that have high concentrations of francophones, particularly in central Quebec and south of Quebec City.

They performed better in these ridings than in 2014.

On the other hand, the CAQdid poorly in ridings with high numbers of recent immigrants. This, perhaps, is not surprising given itscontroversial campaign promise to cut immigration levels by 20 per cent.

The partyperformed worse in these riding than in 2014.

CAQ: Support among trade workers

Given that theCAQ is a centre-right party, it is perhaps surprising to see how wellit didin ridings that had high numbers of people working in the trades (welders, electricians, etc.).

Many of these ridings, though,are locatedin Quebec'sindustrial belt, east of Montreal. The recent rise of an entrepreneurial culture in these ridings has coincided with increased support for the CAQ, a phenomenon we explored in more detail here.

There was only a weak correlation in 2014 between CAQvote-share and presence of trade workers in a riding. That correlation became much more pronounced in 2018.

QubecSolidaire: for the young and precarious

The left-leaningparty surprised many people by winning four seats outside of Montrealandin areas not commonly associated with progressive politics.

One big factor that explains this breakout performance is the party's support among young people.

QS won two seats in Quebec City and one in western Quebec. These urban centres have a larger proportion ofpeople aged 15 to 29, as this map shows.

QS also demonstrated that its promises which include free education, more public transit and universal dental care resonate in ridings where many people are struggling to make ends meet.

This map demonstrates there is a correlation between the number oflow-income households (as measured by the low-income cut-offmeasure)and QS vote-share. In other words, more low-income homes, more votes for QS.

Theparty did well, too, in ridings with higher numbers of part-time workers. There could be some overlap here, as part-time workers tend to be young and less wealthy.

Liberals: still strong among Anglos and immigrants

The Liberal Party has long been the go-tochoice for Quebec's anglophones, and thatdidn't change on Monday. But voterturnout in anglophone-heavy ridings dropped significantly, which hurt the party's popular vote score.

Liberals have also, traditionally, been able to count on the support of immigrants. Our data suggests that trend held true in this election.

In fact, the Liberalsimproved their performance in ridings with large immigrant populations, compared to 2014.

But their support worsened in largely francophoneridings, which represent a far greater number of seats in the National Assembly.

Methodology

To make these maps, the CBCcompared election results in 2014 and 2018 to socio-demographic data from Quebec's chief returning officer (DGEQ), which is based on the 2016 census.

We calculated thePearson correlation between each party's vote share and about 50 selected census variables across all ridings. The mapsabove show the variables withthe highest correlations. Note that no variable had a perfect positive or negative correlation with vote results. For example, the strongest correlation coefficient, of-0.87,wasfound between Liberal vote share and proportion of francophones.