Quebec Superior Court upholds most of religious symbols ban, but English-language schools exempt
Government plans to appeal, saying exemption will create a more divided Quebec
Quebec's secularism law violates the basic rights of religious minorities in the province, but those violations are permissible because of the Constitution's notwithstanding clause, a Superior Court judge ruled on Tuesday.
But the ruling by Justice Marc-Andr Blanchard also declared that the most contentious parts of the law the religious symbols ban for many government employees can't be applied to English schools.
The desire of English school boards to foster diversity by choosing who they hire is protected by the minority-language education rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Blanchard said in his decision.
Crucially, that section of the charter (23)is not covered by the notwithstanding clause.
Not long after the decision was handed down, Quebec Justice Minister Simon Jolin-Barrette,the architect of Bill 21, said the province plans to appeal.
He said the court's decision to exempt English schools threatens todividethe province along linguistic lines and create two categories of Quebecers.
"We don't agree with the judgment," he said. "We need to keep united in Quebec, and all the laws that are adopted here at the National Assembly have to apply to everyone."
Other than the decision regarding English schools, the judgment largely left the law intact. It was facing four separate legal challenges, each containing several different arguments about why the law is unconstitutional.
The 240-page ruling comes roughly a year and a half after the Coalition Avenir Qubec government passed Bill 21, which bans some civil servants, including teachers, police officers and government lawyers,from wearing religious symbols at work.
The restrictions were necessary, the government said, to protect Quebec's unique version of secularism, or laicity.
Civil liberties groups, including the National Council of Canadian Muslims and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, began filing lawsuits against Bill 21 as soon as it was passed.
In passing the law, the Quebec government invoked the notwithstanding clause, meaning the law couldn't be challenged on the grounds that it violated basic rights containedin sections 2 and 7 through 15 of the charter.
These sections contain safeguards for free speech, religious freedom and gender equality.
A protest was quickly organized Monday in downtown Montreal to denounce the law, and call for it to be struck down in its entirety.
Law affects Muslim women above all, judge says
Blanchard said the government respected the rules for invoking the clause. He made it clear, though, that the law trampled on minority rights by restricting what they can wear in the workplace, such as a hijab.
"The court highlights the evidence [that] undoubtedly shows that the effects of Law 21 will be felt negatively above all by Muslim women," the decision reads.
"On the one handby violating their religious freedom, and on the other hand by also violating their freedom of expression, because clothing is both expression, pure and simple, and can also constitute a manifestation of religious belief."
Blanchard also ruled that members of the province'sNational Assemblycan't be forced to provide services to the public with their faces uncovered.
In other words, MNAs are allowed to wear religious symbols that cover their faces, such as a niqab, in accordance with the section of the charter that guarantees every citizen the right to be eligible to vote and be a member of the legislature.
WATCH| A Sikh teacher reacts to the ruling:
A win for English school boards
The ruling represented a victory for English school boards, who have been outspoken against the law even as they fight for their very existencein a separate battleover the province's education reforms.
The English Montreal School Board, which brought forward one of thechallenges against Bill 21,said in a statement itwas "elated" with the decision to exempt English-language boards.
"We value the diversity of our students and staff and respect their personal and religious rights, which are guaranteed both by the Canadian and Quebec Charters of Rights," said boardchairJoe Ortona.
In a statement of its own, the Dorval-basedLester B. Pearson School Board, another English board, said the ruling would go "a long way in terms of ensuring religious freedom can continue"in itsdifferent schools and centres.
But teacher Amrit Kaur, a Sikhwoman from Montreal who wears a turban (dastar), described the ruling as "bittersweet."
During the trial last November, Kaurtold the court she was forced to take a teaching job in British Columbia after she finished her education degree in 2019.
On Tuesday, Kaur said she is reminded of the many teachers trying to work in the French system"who can't teach and they have to re-evaluate what they're going to do with their lives."
"My heart really goes out to them, and I'm thinking about them a lot today," she said.
Law's challengers also see an avenue to appeal
Tuesday's decision marks the first time a court has issued an opinion on the law's constitutionality. It is, however,highly unlikely to settle the matter.
Most legal experts expect the issue will eventually be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Michael Bryant, executive director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said thejudgment "sets us up well for an appeal," given that itacknowledges the harm the law causes.
"Of course, everybody who cares about what this law does to people's dignity are disappointed that that law continues," he said.
"But I would say that, legally, I am heartened as to what the future holds because I think we're well set up to make a very strong appeal."
WATCH l Understanding Bill 21 and the notwithstanding clause:
With files from Justin Hayward and Simon Nakonechny
_(720p).jpg)
 OFFICIAL HD MUSIC VIDEO.jpg)
.jpg)
