No niqabs on public buses? Confusion reigns after surprise amendments to Quebec bill

A new proposalby the Quebec governmentto dictate what people wear when they give or receive public services is causing anger and confusion.

On Tuesday, Justice MinisterStphanieValleproposed amendments to Bill 62 that would see the legislation apply tomunicipalities, metropolitan communities, the National Assembly and public transit organizations.

• Back to arguing over religious headwear at National Assembly

Initially the bill, which would forcepeople offering or receiving a public service to do so with their face uncovered, was only to apply to provincial public sector services. It included some exemptions for people who wear face coverings for religious reasons.

But sinceBill 62 was first tabled in 2015,there has been a lot of confusion over whether Muslim women would be able to access public services, such as riding a bus,while wearing aniqab, saidWardaNaili,aQuebec Muslim womanwho wears a niqab.

Naili said the decision to expand the bill's reach made it appear the Liberalswere"tossing a bone"to anti-immigrant sentiment in the province.

• Quebec tables new religious neutrality bill banning face coverings

Now, given the bill would apply to public transit authorities,she's worried a bus driver might ask her to remove her veil if the new amendments to the bill are passed.

"It's in public," she said, referring to the prospect of taking her niqab off in a bus."It's in front of everyone. It's shaming to have to do it in front of everyone."

Coderrerebuffs amendments

Montreal Mayor Denis Coderrealso raised concerns about the latest version of the bill, accusing the provincial government of overstepping its jurisdiction and ignoring the city's multicultural character.

It was also unclear to him if religious face coverings would be banned on city buses.

"When someone with aniqabarrives with their children, are we going to tell them, 'You aren't entering into the busorwe're notgiving you services?"Coderreasked during an executive committee meetingWednesday morning.

Montreal's transit authority, the STM, is not commenting on how its service may be affected, noting that Bill62 has yet to become law. But a spokesperson did say the STM was not consultedabout the proposed amendments.

• Quebec government blasted on Day 1 of hearings into bill on religious neutrality

Vallewas asked repeatedly ata news conference whether the bill would apply to people riding public transit.

She said she didn't want to comment on specific examples of how the bill would be applied, but added that it wouldn't be used to deny people access to services.

"We cannot say that no accommodation is possible,"Vallesaid.