Federal proposal to lower legal blood-alcohol limit meets opposition - Action News
Home WebMail Thursday, November 14, 2024, 01:26 AM | Calgary | 6.7°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Montreal

Federal proposal to lower legal blood-alcohol limit meets opposition

Federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould is considering lowering the legal alcohol limit for licensed drivers from 0.08 to 0.05.

Ottawa considers decreasing limit from 0.08% to 0.05% as a measure to reduce drunk driving

a woman blows into a blood alcohol censor
Lowering the legal alcohol limit would make it easier to fight drunk driving, according to Federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press)

Federal Justice MinisterJodyWilson-Raybouldhas announcedshe isconsidering lowering the legal alcohol limit for drivers, but some say it's far from a solution todrunk driving.

Wilson-Raybouldsent a letter to Quebec Justice Minister Stephanie Valle in May in which she suggested lowering the limit to 50 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood from the current 80 milligrams.

The federal minister says the change would make it easier to fight drunk driving.

Not so, says Hubert Sacy, the director ofduc'alcool.

"Youdon'tpull a rabbit out of a hat and just decide that this is the magic answer to everything," Sacytells CBC News.

"Everywhere where drunk driving has decreased it has never beenthe result of a legislative change only,"Sacysays. "There's tons of measures that need to come before that."

Sacysays much of the work needs to be done on the provincial level, including increasing the perception that drunk drivers will be caught. More road checks are needed, he says,and restaurant and bar servers should have the power to stop drunk patrons from driving.

Hubert Sacy, the director of duc'alcool, says enforcement measures should be taken before a change in the law. (CBC)

Wilson-Raybould says the current rules were established after research indicated the risk of being involved in a car crash was twice as likely when a driver has 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood.

The minister writes that modern-day research suggests the earlier data underestimated that risk.

Wilson-Raybouldsays in her letter to Vallethat she was keen to hear her colleague's thoughts on the proposed legislative change.

But, Sacysays, "nowhere on planet Earth, by just changing one law, have things improved."

Change would hurt restaurateurs

The prospect of a lower limit is especially worrying to the restaurant industry, according to Martin Vzinaof the Quebec Restaurant Association.

He, too, would like to see other measures put in place before reducing the limit, which he fears will discourage potential patrons from going out to restaurants and bars at all.

"It will be a change in the consumer habits," he says. "Some citizens will say, 'Oh Iwill stay at homeand drink instead.'"

Vzinasays it wouldn't only affect alcohol sales, but food sales as well. It would hit the industry even harder in areas outside cities, where the only way to get to a restaurant is with a car.

He feels that instead of targeting drivers who may truly be a problem on the roads, a change in the law could "criminalizecivilians who've had two glasses of wine with their meal."

Bad timing, says CAA

The Canadian Automobile Association's Quebec organization responded to the announcement bysaying it's too soon to lower the limit, with the legalization of cannabis on its way.

"If the BAC limit is reduced to 0.05 as well, we believe the governments would be biting off more than they can chew, and the pill for motorists would be too hard to swallow," says Marco Harrison, director ofCAA-Quebec, in a news release.

Instead, the association wants authorities to do more to prevent drunk driving, calling on the Quebec government to earmark funds to help police set up more road checks.

In its statement, the CAA alsoadds that in other provinces, when a driver's blood-alcohol contentregistersbetween 0.05 and 0.08, a warning or a fine is given,without the driver having to face criminal charges.

"Going ahead with an immediate change to the Criminal Code, with no phase-in period, could well create a lot of confusion and discontent," it says.

With files from CBC's Navneet Pall and The Canadian Press